Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI blew off killer e-mail to al Qaeda: Officials admit shrugging off gunman's e-mails to Qaeda
NY Post ^ | November 10, 2009 | JOHN DOYLE and CHUCK BENNETT

Posted on 11/10/2009 3:11:44 AM PST by Scanian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: CodeJockey

Man, I agree.

I am just not aware of what the emails were about. That IS pretty damning.


41 posted on 11/10/2009 6:52:56 AM PST by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Shane
Until we weed out, throw out, and stamp out the Marxist forces at all levels of government, the lives of our families are severely at risk.

Agree completely. We can start with the CIC.

Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him?

42 posted on 11/10/2009 8:37:46 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caddie
Swearing an oath of allegiance would do no good for two reasons. First, a Muslim can lie to an infidel with the blessing of Allah. Second, here is the oath taken from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services site. Notice especially the last couple of paragraphs about not having to say certain things if it is "against your religious training or beliefs".
The oath of allegiance is:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

In some cases, USCIS allows the oath to be taken without the clauses:

". . .that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by law. . ."

If USCIS finds that you are unable to swear the oath using the words “on oath,” you may replace these words with “and solemnly affirm.” If USCIS finds that you are unable to use the words “so help me God” because of your religious training or beliefs, you are not required to say these words.


43 posted on 11/10/2009 8:48:05 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
When did an active-duty member of the Armed Forces attempting to contact the enemy become *not* treason??

When we're not in a declared war. It may well be some other crime, but legally it isn't treason.

44 posted on 11/10/2009 12:18:55 PM PST by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Here is an exceptional article dealing with the deadly domestic threat we now face - and it's not just murderous Islamists.

If you haven't yet read it, please do so...

The Left and Terror

45 posted on 11/10/2009 12:19:19 PM PST by Gritty (It's no longer a game. People will die because of actions taken by this country's leftists-JR Dunn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

Thank you...I read that the other day and wanted to post it but Neverdem beat me to it - he is very big on AT also.

Good article!


46 posted on 11/10/2009 3:30:16 PM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gorilla_warrior

bingo!


47 posted on 11/10/2009 10:06:40 PM PST by guitarplayer1953 (Romak 7.62X54MM, AK47 7.62X39MM, LARGO 9X23MM, HAPINESS IS A WARM GUN BANG BANG YEA YEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

He’s not a gunman, he is a terrorist on a jihad.


48 posted on 11/11/2009 5:40:18 AM PST by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson