Man, oh man- I’d give a lot to know what he’s saying...
P.S. Is it ok if I don’t refer to this jihadist as the “alleged” shooter?
The media is engaging in BS by calling him “suspect” and “alleged shooter”. Even “not guilty by reason of insanity” would not clear him from claims that HE was the shooter.
It isn’t like the Oswald case where the perp was apprehended away from the scene and MAY not have done what he was accused of. This man was shot down IN ACTION.
Did the media EVER say “suspected war criminals” or “alleged flushing of a koran”?
The yellow journalists ran with the lies for MONTHS and enranged the enemy with propaganda.