Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
"I have a sneaky suspicion that the next problem will be a deck or span collapse"

Agree!

The new design is very questionable at best. The concept of a 'self-anchoring' suspension in bay mud is absurd.

22 posted on 11/02/2009 4:24:06 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

can you imagine these fat bureaucrats who normally go home at 3:30 and haven’t worked on friday in years “working “on that old bridge?? What a knee slapping joke.


23 posted on 11/02/2009 5:45:36 PM PST by londonfog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
Again wrong on another subject. Just like you believe the sun goes around the earth.

Happened to read this as I live in the area (going on the bridge today). The new suspension segment is not anchored in mud. They went down to bedrock. That's the reason they couldn't put it on the south side of the present bridge.
The anchors for the current cantilever section are in mud. They couldn't find bedrock and drove 90 foot wood poles (trees) down in the mud for anchorage.

28 posted on 11/03/2009 5:56:37 AM PST by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson