The person who wrote that article seems full of sour grapes. I am not saying it is untrue at any part, but the wording makes me think he is not a fan of President Bush.
The person who wrote that article seems full of sour grapes.
$$$$$
It reads like a typical New York Times article - taking very leftwing positions as ‘middle of the road’ or ‘centrist’ or ‘mainstream’.
Lefties have different fact sets stored in their brains, so it is hard for us to even read their articles.
Example:
I looked at a NYT article today titled:
Brother of Afghan Leader Said to Be Paid by C.I.A.
Conservative talk show listeners have heard that this is totally bogus and denied by the CIA and by the Karzai brothers. But, when I peeked at the comments by NYT readers the first ten were all in total agreement that they were reading fact; that Karzai must go; that the CIA can never be trusted; etc. etc. There were no dissenting or skeptical comments. I did not read the entire article, but I will bet that the NYT writer did not include the fact that James Carville is a political adviser to Karzai’s opponent, or if they did they put it in the next to last paragraph.
My money would be on Carville to have been the “said” person of the title.