[Genoa]

If he stated that the voters trump the Constitution (in effect), then he’s not the upright jurist everyone was saying. Mob rule.

[Perdogg]

That's not what he said. What he said was that the plaintiff was asking the court to overturn the election process. I believe that the plaintiff didn't have standing to begin with, only the candidates. Look, I don't like zero anymoe than you do, but there was ample opportunity to raise these issue with voters and then with the House. I do not want the courts involved with an election unless the parties have standing.

[lucysmom]

If he stated that the voters trump the Constitution (in effect), then he’s not the upright jurist everyone was saying. Mob rule.

He said exactly the opposite.

[mlo]

"If he stated that the voters trump the Constitution (in effect), then he’s not the upright jurist everyone was saying. Mob rule."

He didn't state anything like that.