I think we’ve had a misunderstanding here.
My original statement pertains to point 4 from the OPs post. It said the following:
“Aliens inhabit alternate plane: PhysOrg said that two scientists have calculated the “number of parallel universes.” An impressive equation enhances the article. The answer: 10 to the 10 to the 16 universes are out there, even though we’ve never seen them or can see them. “If that number sounds large, the scientists explain that it would have been even more humongous, except that we observers are limited in our ability to distinguish more universes” otherwise it could be a whopping 10 to the 10 to the 10 to the 7.”
The problem I have here is that people believe in these universes that we can’t observe, unless someone’s invented a dimensional transporter without my knowing.
I don’t talk about theoretical physics for a reason.
I do not believe in parallel universes any more than I believe that Man walked the planet with vegetarian T. rex before the Fall and lived with 100+ large meat eating dinosaurs until the Flood killed them all.
....but to wholly discount a hypothesis that algae blooms participated in extinction events simply because there are....OMG....”always questions”....well...that’s the tactic of the YEC types lik GGG that post this nonsense.....and why I commented on it.
I’ll leave the theoretical physics to those that haven’t foudn a real world application for their education.