Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear power: Wave of the past or future?
VentureBeat ^ | October 15, 2009 | Tom Slater

Posted on 10/16/2009 10:02:11 AM PDT by Willie Green

The U.S. may soon get its first nuclear reactor in more than 30 years. UniStar Nuclear Energy — a joint venture between Baltimore-based Constellation Energy and the EDF Group — has proposed a new reactor for southern Maryland capable of generating 1,600 megawatts and powering 1.3 million homes twenty-four hours a day.

To put this in context, the largest wind power installation in the world, the Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center in Texas, generates 735 megawatts — but only when it’s windy. Nuclear, by comparison, is massive.

Having cleared the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the New York Public Service Commission, the project is in the final phase of due diligence for a cut of the $18.5 billion in federal dollars earmarked for advanced nuclear development. There seems to be only one remaining roadblock: the Maryland Public Service Commission.

Even though the MPSC approved the reactor itself in late June after an 18-month study, there has been a great deal of protest around the hearings for the deal between Constellation Energy and the EDF Group. With a price tag of $7 billion, the reactor will require not only federal loan guarantees, but also substantial investment from EDF, requiring them to purchase a 50 percent stake in Constellation.

This seems straightforward enough. But the snag — apparently large enough to re-open MPSC hearings several times — lies in whether the investment would give French EDF too much influence over an American power company, Constellation’s subsidiary Baltimore Power & Light.

Those opposing the reactor and the deal between EDF and Constellation have called attention to potential energy rate hikes that could be levied to offset the cost of the plant’s construction. Despite what EDF calls “overwhelming public support” for the reactor voiced during the hearings, it seems there is a small but significant group opposed to it on financial terms. This group has issued construction estimates of up to $15 billion.

To counter these arguments, Constellation says the deal’s approval would create 4,000 construction jobs as well as 400 permanent positions at the reactor, while ultimately benefiting the area with cheaper electricity as well.

A hot topic of debate in the region, the reactor is emblematic of the U.S. nuclear industry as a whole. If one of the first realistic proposals in 30 years is stopped, how much hope will there be for the next?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: electricity; energy; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2009 10:02:11 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
capable of generating 1,600 megawatts and powering 1.3 million homes twenty-four hours a day

Try doing that with alternative energy!


2 posted on 10/16/2009 10:05:36 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
>>>>>The U.S. may soon get its first nuclear reactor in more than 30 years.

Great news! Hopefully, the first in a new trend.

3 posted on 10/16/2009 10:08:34 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

A big part of the near term (future). Do it!


4 posted on 10/16/2009 10:12:59 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Check this out: http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com

From their website: "Hyperion Power Generation is commercializing the world’s first transportable nuclear power module in the quest for clean, non-polluting fail-safe, affordable and accessible power."

It's a single 6 feet tall mini-nuclear generator that is buried underground and can potentially provide electricity for 20,000 homes. Pretty cool.

5 posted on 10/16/2009 10:13:13 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Buy Gold and Guns Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

If the US wants a future, we had better develop a workable energy policy. Nuclear is about the only alternative to living in the dark & shivering, especially if the Dims can push cap & tax through.


6 posted on 10/16/2009 10:22:22 AM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy's not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

put one in the yard, sell power to all your neighbors!

great retirement buisness idea!


7 posted on 10/16/2009 10:23:35 AM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
It's a single 6 feet tall mini-nuclear generator that is buried underground and can potentially provide electricity for 20,000 homes. Pretty cool.

I like the mini-nukes and think they should have a niche sometime in the distant future.
But priorities dictate focusing on getting the big plants going again. They've been dormant way too long, and the mini-nukes are a controversial distraction.

8 posted on 10/16/2009 10:35:29 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

The French, yes, the French get 95% of their power from nukes. What is wrong with the LIBTARDS? Don’t they understand that if the French can do this safely, the U.S. of A. can do it “in spades”!


9 posted on 10/16/2009 10:38:37 AM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

why do I get the feeling that The China Syndrome is suddenly going to hit hot rotation on AMC?


10 posted on 10/16/2009 10:42:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
Taking their figure of $25 to $30 million for the module, 20,000 average homes and a 5 year life before refueling, the cost works out to around $250 per house per year. Not too bad.
11 posted on 10/16/2009 10:47:20 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Agreed! This all goes back to the leftist hysteria of Three Mile Island and the China Syndrome movie of the late 1970`s. Part of the envirowacko extremist movement and eventual WashDC lobby that killed the nuclear reactor business.


12 posted on 10/16/2009 10:50:03 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
why do I get the feeling that The China Syndrome is suddenly going to hit hot rotation on AMC?

And the Hildebeast will want publik skool kids to take potassium iodide along with their Ritalin.

13 posted on 10/16/2009 10:52:19 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I get my power from BGE (Baltimore Gas and Electric, not “Baltimore Power and Light” - geesh, doesn't anyone even try to do journalism anymore??). I view this very, very positively. This plant will generate nearly as much power as the two plants already on-site at Calvert Cliffs, and it will have one-fifth the physical footprint and will impact the surrounding land, water and natural resources much less than even the current plants. There is enough land at Calvert Cliffs to build several more of these.
14 posted on 10/16/2009 11:00:33 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Cool! Thanks for the on-the-frontlines support!!!


15 posted on 10/16/2009 11:04:40 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The South Texas Project will beat Unistar, They have already started ground preparation for two ABWR’s right nest to the 2 4-loop PWR’s they already operate.

Our parent company Toshiba has sold them and STP has already had the first of the COL (Construction-Operating Liscense) hearings.


16 posted on 10/16/2009 12:05:02 PM PDT by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Nuclear power is a vital part of our energy independence.


17 posted on 10/16/2009 12:06:53 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

They say it only needs service every 7 - 10 years (replacing the fuel) and is constantly monitored remotely. If this works, it would be a great investment opportunity. However, they get their funding from a private capital firm. The fund where their investors put their money is closed. Darn.


18 posted on 10/16/2009 12:06:56 PM PDT by Dr. Thorne (Buy Gold and Guns Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

we have almost double the nuke plants than the French do - 102 vs 59.


19 posted on 10/16/2009 12:12:20 PM PDT by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Calvert Cliffs is probably the prettiest nuke site in the world, equaled only by the Angra site in Brazil. I’ve worked at both along with about 20 other nukes in the US.


20 posted on 10/16/2009 12:14:56 PM PDT by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson