Hopefully this will trend to more colleges regardless of color or ethnicity.
1 posted on
10/15/2009 12:58:55 PM PDT by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: kristinn
23 posted on
10/15/2009 1:09:25 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: kristinn
"No wearing of clothing associated with women's garb"
LOL!
To: kristinn
25 posted on
10/15/2009 1:09:58 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
To: kristinn
Morehouse is still liberal as all get out, and liberals have never made the same demands of Blacks that they have of whites. I’m sure that whatever “homophobia” or “transphobia” or whatever they call it will be excused as “part of their culture.” Which is true, and which is great, but I wish they’d give us all the same leeway.
26 posted on
10/15/2009 1:10:15 PM PDT by
Zionist Conspirator
(Bere'shit bara' 'Eloqim 'et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz.)
To: kristinn
27 posted on
10/15/2009 1:11:05 PM PDT by
misterrob
(A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
To: kristinn
But if a white guy did it, it would be condemned as racist and disrespectful of A-A culture.
34 posted on
10/15/2009 1:17:11 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
To: kristinn
Rush should have a regular segment where he highlights people and institutions that don’t know that they’re conservatives.
36 posted on
10/15/2009 1:18:35 PM PDT by
mc6809e
To: kristinn
37 posted on
10/15/2009 1:19:47 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: kristinn
Nice to learn than someone, somewhere, has some standards. Good for Morehouse. Their students will benefit greatly from this in the long run. One of the things Louis Farrakan did with his youth organization that I approve of, regardless of all the other nonsense, is to require the kids to wear jackets and ties. They are the only ones who come up to me at stoplights in Washington, DC selling newspapers that I am not afraid of because they are unfailingly polite and respectful. And they don’t look like asylum escapees.
38 posted on
10/15/2009 1:20:39 PM PDT by
La Lydia
To: kristinn
Item #2 - they should proof read/edit. Work = worn?
39 posted on
10/15/2009 1:21:44 PM PDT by
NEMDF
To: kristinn
Hold the phone! Whoa! Back the bus up, Driver! An all-male college? Cross dressers? Please tell me that the date-hungry know that their ‘escorts’ have callouses on their hands (per Timmy Wilson), right? Surely they know they are dancin’ with a man? Please...
40 posted on
10/15/2009 1:23:31 PM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: kristinn
It’s about time. Those who know me know I can’t talk too much but the banned outfits are the antithesis of dressing for success.
To: kristinn
To: kristinn
Who wears pajamas in public?
I'd ask the same thing of most of this other stuff....but PJ's kind of stick out.
46 posted on
10/15/2009 2:17:29 PM PDT by
wbill
To: kristinn
Are you sure this is real??? I question the authenticity of this document only because of the grammatical and spelling errors contained therein. No college would produce such a poorly crafted document. If it is genuine, I'd suggest more than sprucing up the dress code.
To: kristinn
Why on earth would anyone want to put clothes on a cross?
To: kristinn
HEAR, HEAR!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson