Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texting, talking on your cell phone while driving in Okla. could soon become nanny state 'no-no'
Oklahoma Watchdog ^ | October 14, 2009 | Andrew W. Griffin

Posted on 10/14/2009 1:13:02 PM PDT by SoonerStorm09

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: SoonerStorm09; All

Anything else they need to write a law for to legislate common sense?!



41 posted on 10/14/2009 1:59:07 PM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

lol


42 posted on 10/14/2009 1:59:22 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: eXe

How do you get that big Ham antennae on your car?


43 posted on 10/14/2009 2:00:23 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
This is liberatarianism taken to the level of idiocy.

I will admit to taking a call when I'm on the road. In general, though, cell phone use while driving is bordering on an epidemic.

It's only common sense that your driving is impaired while talking on the phone, or God forbid, texting. It wasn't such a big deal 15 years ago, before cell phone usage exploded.

I'm surprised insurance companies haven't stepped in on this topic.

44 posted on 10/14/2009 2:01:00 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

While I appreciate the sentiment, where do you draw the line on what laws should be on the books regarding driving and what laws step over the line?


45 posted on 10/14/2009 2:03:36 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Perhaps the police coule catch some, but given the limited resources of most law enforcement agencies, I would rather them spend their time on crime prevention than regulating traffic.


46 posted on 10/14/2009 2:06:21 PM PDT by Brookhaven (http://theconservativehand.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: eXe
What next? No touching the radio, no drinking a soda, no talking?

Most newer models allow the driver to change the radio from the steering wheel.

You're equating drinking a soda, an activity that requires no thought, with cell phone usage? Talk about false equivalency.

One can carry on a conversation while keeping both hands on the wheel, and paying full attention to the road.

Now, carrying on a conversation while drinking a soda...that's a horse of a different color. :^)

47 posted on 10/14/2009 2:07:23 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
Truly dirtboy it is a question of how much risk are you willing to assume, vs how much risk you wish to transfer to others.

I'd rather not have some 20-something idiot kill me because he's busy texting while driving, thank you! It is not his perogative to shift that risk to others who have no say in the matter. If a couple of high-profile enforcement crackdowns gets these pinheads to stop, so be it.

48 posted on 10/14/2009 2:07:24 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BP2
Now, let's try a concept - relative severity. How long does a guy eating while driving take his eyes off the road? Or the guy scanning for a radio station?

Now compare that to texting, where the full attention of the driver goes to his cell for several seconds.

49 posted on 10/14/2009 2:10:51 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Cut me a friggin break. This is liberatarianism taken to the level of idiocy.

Okay, let's pull all licenses of drivers over the age of 65. Elderly drivers are just as dangerous as drunk drivers. That sound good?
50 posted on 10/14/2009 2:10:59 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eXe
The solution is simple.. if someone causes an accident while texting they need to be hit with the same kind of penalty a drunk driver will be hit with.

Small comfort to the person they killed or maimed.

51 posted on 10/14/2009 2:12:20 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Pretty sure that where I draw that line and where most people draw that line is quite different. It is a question of how much risk you are willing to assume versus how much you wish to transfer. I just don’t like living (and driving) a gauntlet of potential law enforcement encounters. It is so bad now that to drive the 2 miles to the local grocery store I regularly encounter 10-15 police standing in the median shining flashlights inside my car... I don’t want to live that way. I really really wish that folks would take responsibility for their own safety and leave the government and it’s guns out of it. If everybody took safety seriously then no worries. I know that not everybody does and that speaks to education levels, temperament etc. But most accidents are avoidable. I had a near one yesterday when a lady tried to pull into my lane from a side street. Because I have thought about and rehearsed in my mind what to do I avoided what for most people would have been a three car accident, because the truck behind me would have plowed into me. But because I take driving seriously I avoided a near accident. But I don’t need or demand the government to be the guarantor of my safety. I am responsible. YOU are responsible. Leave the government and it’s guns and courts out of it. Yes bad things happen to good people all the time... We are not immortal nor are we infallible. But one has to accept that premise in order for everything else to follow so it is almost a religious or at the very least a philosophical acceptance of life.


52 posted on 10/14/2009 2:12:41 PM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
Elderly drivers are just as dangerous as drunk drivers.

Proof, please. BTW, in a lot of states, once an elderly driver does degrade to a certain point, their license does get revoked.

So try again to make your pointless point.

53 posted on 10/14/2009 2:13:26 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane
It is a question of how much risk you are willing to assume versus how much you wish to transfer.

Once again, it is NOT your perogative to shift that risk to someone else on the highway who does not have a vote.

54 posted on 10/14/2009 2:14:05 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: goseminoles
I’ve been guilty of texting and driving. Its very dangerous IMHO. Of course, I don’t wear a seatbelt either.

Not wearing your seatbelt endangers only you. Texting and driving endangers me.

55 posted on 10/14/2009 2:14:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
This thread is full of strawman arguments.

Why don't you pull out your proof and compare accidents caused by texters/cell phone and drunk drivers.
56 posted on 10/14/2009 2:15:11 PM PDT by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You and I will disagree. I would rather take my chances with a dunderhead than add prerogative and enforcement power to the state. Yes, bad things happen to good people and I can accept that. We are not immortals after all.


57 posted on 10/14/2009 2:16:14 PM PDT by DariusBane (Even the Rocks shall cry out "Hobamma to the Highest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoonerStorm09

Why shouldn’t states ban texting while driving? It’s worse than DUIs (at least you’re watching the road while drunk), and you are operating a 1-2 ton killing machine—this is not an “individual” rights issue.


58 posted on 10/14/2009 2:17:10 PM PDT by montag813 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

I don’t see them spending time on crime prevention, I see them sitting on the side of the road catching speeders with radar.


59 posted on 10/14/2009 2:18:00 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Wow, where do you live that the police do that?


60 posted on 10/14/2009 2:20:07 PM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson