Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
They say he offers no solution to replace federal tort reform, but haven't several states enacted their own? Isn't that the solution?

That and moving more aggressively to police all of the quacks out there.

6 posted on 10/10/2009 12:46:43 PM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave
Doesn't it seem outrageous for the "conservative" party to be advocating federal takeover of state tort law? And yet, no one blinks. It sounds good. It was only recently I bothered to even think about the issue. It's been a GOP talking point for some time, and I finally asked myself--what is it? When I found out, I realized it was wrong.

I looked up Ron Paul's stance on it for fun, and found that, sure enough, he opposed it.

But you've got all these talkers--Rush, Hannity, Levin, etc---all clamoring for it. I'm sure they'd never take a call questioning the constitutionality of it. That question would never make it past the screener. And so it goes. Sliding along that slippery slope. We're playing around at the margins. All the decisive battles are lost.

7 posted on 10/10/2009 12:51:16 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson