Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RAO1125
Aye, but does a state government’s intervention really that much better than a Federal government’s intervention? Perhaps.

It's better because it's smaller, closer and thereby(in theory) more accountable to its electorate, and (again in theory) more likely to be in sync with its electorate. Also, there's the whole labratories of democracy concept--several states are trying various forms of tort reform. (One more time in theory) We benefit from the variety of experiments, and are not locked into one top-down approach.

I'm not saying I am FOR state gubmint intervention--just saying it's for each state to decide for itself through the republican process.

27 posted on 10/10/2009 11:08:07 PM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Under the 10th Amendment, it’s certainly more Constitutional. I guess it’s the principal that bothers me some.


30 posted on 10/11/2009 4:35:38 AM PDT by RAO1125 (Revolution's are for Marxists. We need a Constitutional Restoration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson