4) To discredit some aspects of the book that show the 0ne in an unfavorable light or to deny some of the “facts” in it.
5) Ayers is putting out a book of his own
6) Cashill or his publisher or WND trolling for publicity
7) Someone yet unknown is writing a tell-all book and Ayers/Obama is part of it
8) Years of Hoffman’s Best has fried his noodles
Wait... Bill Ayers is Jack Cashill’s publisher? Whoa.
“4) To discredit some aspects of the book that show the 0ne in an unfavorable light or to deny some of the “facts” in it”
the book has a disclosure that makes it legally “a work of fiction.” He has all the wiggle room he needs to admit, deny, change the facts, etc
“7) Someone yet unknown is writing a tell-all book and Ayers/Obama is part of it”
possibly, but that would speak to the “trial balloon” theory. Start getting the admission out there casually & see how the public reacts as a method to gauge how to proceed with a BHO confession.