To: myknowledge
2 posted on
10/06/2009 4:25:41 AM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: myknowledge
Erosion coupled with planned destruction.
Not a pretty picture.
3 posted on
10/06/2009 4:29:10 AM PDT by
dforest
(Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
To: myknowledge
Chinese Spying a Threat, Panel Says (2007)
The panel, which was created by Congress in 2001 and has six members appointed by Democrats and six by Republicans, has been criticized for taking a hawkish stance on China in its annual reports. In the one released yesterday, it made 42 recommendations to Congress, and several of them raised questions about whether the Defense Department has been lax in overseeing the production of sensitive military technologies and gathering intelligence on the Chinese military.
The Pentagon is increasingly buying planes, weapons and military vehicles from private contractors that outsource the manufacturing to plants in China and elsewhere in Asia, the report said. But when questioned by the commission, defense officials admitted that they do not have the ability to track where the components of military equipment are made.
"As weaponry gets more and more sophisticated . . . I think well find ourselves more vulnerable for parts that are being manufactured by an adversary. It's really something the Pentagon needs to look at seriously," said commission member William A. Reinsch, president of the National Foreign Trade Council, which promotes free trade on behalf of businesses. Members said that the commission had never before delved so deeply into national security issues.
Pure genius. [/sarc]
6 posted on
10/06/2009 4:34:23 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: myknowledge
Then the deciding factor will remain the quality of the pilots. And the Air Force needs to make sure that doesn’t change.
To: myknowledge
Meanwhile, Obama removes anti-missle defenses in Eastern Europe and wants to elimate Nukes...........brilliant!
8 posted on
10/06/2009 4:42:03 AM PDT by
Dem Guard
To: myknowledge
not to worry, the bomb is here to make us weaker.
9 posted on
10/06/2009 4:59:25 AM PDT by
The Wizard
(I support Madame President)
To: myknowledge
I worked for General Deptula during Desert Storm and he went through requal twice while I was the Superintendent of F-15 Training at Tyndall. He’s an exceptionally bright guy and a top notch pilot.
11 posted on
10/06/2009 5:31:09 AM PDT by
mbynack
(Retired USAF SMSgt)
To: myknowledge
U.S. Air Dominance Eroding because the Aviation-industrial complex put so much money into the soon-to-be-overwhelmed-by-remotely-piloted-and-missiles F-22 and F-35.
13 posted on
10/06/2009 5:40:52 AM PDT by
flowerplough
( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
To: myknowledge
It’s difficult to pick up what Greg Grants goal is here.
He seems to trash every one of our systems, as he plays up the threat across the board. Well I do agree that threat is growing and is serious. But what do we do about it?
The F22 is the premier fighter on the planet, because it can super-cruise better than any other craft. It is also highly maneuverable in the air over it’s targets, or against other aircraft. It’s one more necessary tool in our arsenal.
With tens of thousands of top level aircraft out there around the world, we need more than 260 of the F22s. We need a few thousand of them.
Look, I realize those other aircraft aren’t top notch. Still, if you have literally thousands of them out there against 75 of your own, you’re in a world of hurt.
He talks about airfields at threat in theater. Yes, that’s why the F22’s super cruise is crucial. It can be stationed over 500 miles away and be on target in 30 minutes with fuel to spare.
What are we doing to keep ahead of the enemy? I’d like to know. We look like were in a holding pattern. Well China, Russia and their minions around the planet are not. And that includes their Marxist cabal in the U.S.
Thanks for the link.
16 posted on
10/06/2009 6:03:50 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
To: myknowledge
I think it would have been more accurate to say he is complimenting the enemies capabilities, instead of trashing our capabilities.
None the less, we need to get to work building up for what’s to come.
17 posted on
10/06/2009 6:05:14 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Deficit spending, trade deficits, unsecure mortages, worthless paper... ... not a problem. Oh yeah?)
To: myknowledge
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Space to follow. If he has 8 years, the military will be decimated.
18 posted on
10/06/2009 6:06:20 PM PDT by
nufsed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson