Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Ah, so Science declares we should tax certain varieties of sweetener. And why stop there? Why not have federally-mandated meal plans, and just as a sop to pesky individualists, give people three options to choose from for each course. At least let’s not allow parents to dictate what their kids eat, thereby carrying bad habits into future generations. It’s For the Children!(/s)


14 posted on 10/01/2009 6:07:27 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

That’s where they’re headed. Chips gone. Candy gone. Bacon (damn) gone. Get your soylent green here.


15 posted on 10/01/2009 6:18:50 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Waste and fraud are synonymous with gov't spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Tublecane
Ah, so Science declares we should tax certain varieties of sweetener.

I'm suggesting just HFCS-55.

And why stop there?

Nothing else is as suspect for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

16 posted on 10/01/2009 6:37:55 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson