Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Portnoy

In the first story I can’t help but womder which of the bus stop ladies neighbors ratted her out. They need to find that neighbor and kick her butt for her.
In the second story I am ignorant of any law that takes your name when you buy over the counter medicine.


6 posted on 09/30/2009 4:25:13 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Venturer
There's undoubtedly some neighborhood gal who bothered to get her license, and she charges, and the woman she ratted out isn't even charging anything.

Times are tough.

8 posted on 09/30/2009 4:28:01 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
Anybody who buys anything with pseudoephedrine in it has to sign a registry. It's a precursor to methamphetamine.

It's the same thing you used to have to do when you bought codeine or paregoric syrup. Those are by prescription only now, I think.

But the registry isn't the problem, everybody's had those for certain dangerous drugs since at least the 50s, probably longer. It's lack of investigation by the cops before arresting somebody.

9 posted on 09/30/2009 4:33:29 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of Ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Venturer
In the second story I am ignorant of any law that takes your name when you buy over the counter medicine.

The United States Congress has recognized the use of pseudoephedrine in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine. In late 2005, the Committee on Education and the Workforce heard testimony concerning education programs and state legislation designed to curb the use and manufacture of methamphetamine with pseudoephedrine-containing products. State laws in Oregon and Kansas were particularly influential in the proposed legislation.

The House passed the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 ("CMEA") as an amendment to the renewal of the Patriot Act. Signed into law by president George W. Bush on March 6, 2006, the act amended Title 21 of the United States Code (21 USC 830) concerning the sale of pseudoephedrine-containing products. The Federal statute included the following requirements for merchants ("regulated seller") who sell these products (pseudoephedrine is defined as a "scheduled listed chemical product under 21 U.S.C. § 802(45(A)):

Forty-one individual states also have varying laws on the matter: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawai'i (as of May 1, 2009) Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana (as of August 15, 2009)[20] Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Washington laws require pharmacies to sell pseudoephedrine behind-the-counter and to collect personal information from the purchaser. Oregon requires a prescription to purchase products containing pseudoephedrine.


15 posted on 09/30/2009 5:19:24 AM PDT by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot children are in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson