Next Monday may be the beginning of the end for Hussein.
U.S. District Court Judge Carter "Mr. Obama, I order you to provide this court with your ORIGINAL Birth Certificate."
ping
a little news
BTTT!!!!
“Next Monday may be the beginning of the end for Hussein.”
I am one that has been skeptical of Obama’s legitimacy BUT skeptical of Taitz’ competence. I will be watching this closely and holding you to your statement.
ping
She needs other attorneys to help her. I hope retired JAG officers are helping. Supposedly one on the Grandy Juries tried but was rebuffed. I hope she is getting help. I hope major $$ out there including wealthy people are helping fund leghal help.
She needs to concentrate on the Judge Carter case. This may be her best bet. Hopefully she has help on that case and she is accepting help from other attorneys and she will be composed in court.
We must all PRAY that the TRUTH is allowed in open court.
We must all PRAY for the safety of all on the plaintiff’s side and for the judge.
We must all PRAY for our country!
If we ever see his long form BC, I think it will say he was born in Hawaii. He’s probably holding it back because it would open up other challenges to his citizenship status on other grounds, and the court cases could last for years. JMHO.
Is this an actual quote by this judge or an 'anticipated' comment?
Or not.
bkmrk
Obama won’t show his birth certificate because he is listed as “Caucasian” or “White”. He’d lose his black cred.
I hope Dr. Taitz remains focused only on the new issue presented in Obama’s Reply to Response to Motion. She had the choice to either move to strike the Reply or seek a sur-Reply (rarely used). She has a habit of dumping a 22# dossier on the Court in case she needs to use any of it. Most of the dossier is material suitable for the DOJ to pursue a criminal case.
Personally I would like to see Ms. Pelosi tried in each state she submitted a perjured document, which would drain her wealth, then serve time in each state’s prison, consecutively. Then she could write a book comparing prison food and live off the remaining proceeds after paying any fines to the U.S. Treasury.
It will be interesting to see the outcome of this 'hands tied behind my back'. She needs to be careful of how she responds or she may find herself in deeper with Judge Land.
Judge Land's Order:IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
CONNIE RHODES, Plaintiff,
vs.
THOMAS D. MACDONALD, Colonel, Garrison Commander, Fort Benning; et al., Defendants.
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-106 (CDL)
O R D E R
Plaintiffs counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. 20). Plaintiff apparently does not object to such withdrawal. (See Doc. 18.) Accordingly, counsels motion to withdraw is granted with the following conditions. Counsel remains subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of the Courts show cause sanctions order and related proceedings, and Plaintiff remains subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for purposes of the Courts previous order casting the court costs upon Plaintiff.
The Court further notes that this order shall not be construed to authorize Plaintiffs counsel to breach any attorney-client privilege that may exist due to counsels representation of Plaintiff. Moreover, the Court notifies counsel that in issuing its show cause sanctions order, the Court did not rely upon the letter sent by Plaintiff purporting to discharge counsel (Doc. 18), nor does the Court intend to rely upon that document in future proceedings regarding sanctions against Plaintiffs counsel. Whether Plaintiff expressly authorized counsel to file the motion for reconsideration is irrelevant to the Courts determination of whether the filing was legally frivolous.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of September, 2009.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
BTTT
Carry on with the tough guy stuff, by all means, but don't blame anyone but yourself if you have to clean up a computer mess.
Is this woman an idiot? Let's stipulate for a moment that her claim about Rhodes being under "pressure" is true. Let's also stipulate that Rhodes actually said this to Taitz. Is Taitz so incompetent that she doesn't realize she may have just violated DR 4-101 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, also known as client-attorney privilege?
It's a violation in which disbarment is a likely outcome.
Is this another “how to keep a turkey in suspense” exercise....ie, I’ll tell ya later?
LOL!
I can’t wait! I can’t wait! (gobble gobble)