Posted on 09/28/2009 10:14:11 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Democrat's $1.65 million take from the financial services industry is nearly twice that of any other senator's
Wall Street has showered nearly $11 million on the Senate since the beginning of the year, and more than 15 percent of it has gone to a single senator: Democrat Chuck Schumer of New York.
Schumers $1.65 million take from the financial services industry is nearly twice that of any other senator's and more than five times what the industry gave to any single Republican senator.
While the industry has scaled back its political spending in the wake of last years economic collapse, data from the Center for Responsive Politics show that its still investing heavily in the Senate, where its likely to have its best shot at stopping or at least shaping the crackdown on Wall Street that President Barack Obama has proposed.
And its clearly looking to Democrats to do it.
Of the $10.6 million the industry has given to sitting senators this year, more than $7.7 million has gone to Democrats. Schumer got his $1.65 million; his New York colleague Kirsten Gillibrand took in $886,000; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada received $814,000; Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd of
Connecticut scored $603,000; Colorado freshman Michael Bennet got $401,000; and Agriculture Committee Chairman Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas who will have a big say on the derivatives portion of regulatory reform got $336,000.
Democrats are holding the reins in Washington now with a Democratic-run White House and Congress, said one financial services lobbyist. It only makes sense that donors want to put their money into the coffers of those who are driving the agenda.
Among Republicans, the biggest recipient of financial-industry money so far this year is Richard Shelby of Alabama. But although hes the ranking Republican on the Banking Committee ground zero for the regulatory reform bill in the Senate hes received just $313,000 from the industry this year.
Thats smaller than the haul for Bennet, the most junior Democrat on the Committee, or Lincoln, who isnt even on it. And Shelby is the only Republican senator on the industrys top-10 giving list.
The industrys giving pattern this year may upend the traditional notion of Republicans as the bagmen for Wall Street. But it also reflects political reality: Democrats hold a commanding if not quite filibuster-proof majority in the upper chamber, and some of them may be willing to side with the financial industry on key aspects of the regulatory reform effort even if thats not immediately obvious from the Democrats populist rhetoric.
The Financial Services Roundtable, an industry association that gave almost $425,000 to members during the past election, says the issues not the party drive its donations.
We support members that understand the issues facing our industry, said Scott Talbott, the Rountables senior vice president of government affairs. This is done on a case-by-case basis.
Democrats insist that industry money doesnt influence their votes.
Contributions dont really affect my basis of decision making is whether its going to be beneficial to Arkansans, said Lincoln, who noted that financial services firms arent among her biggest contributors. Schumer spokesman Brian Fallon says his boss calls the shots the way he sees them regardless of whos giving him money.
The financial services industry is a vital part of New Yorks economy, but he doesnt hesitate to go after the institutions when they are wrong, such as with credit cards, corporate governance and overdraft fees, Fallon said.
To compare the $1.7 million hes gotten from the so-called FIRE lobby thats finance, insurance thats not health insurance and real estate with his positions on key elements of reform, you might think his donors are suffering from Stockholm syndrome.
Schumer, No. 3 in the Senate Democratic leadership and the former chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, has offered scads of proposals that the industry doesnt like on issues from corporate governance to derivatives to the creation of a new consumer watchdog for the financial world.
But his top donors include insurance company New York Life Insurance, private equity firm Lightyear Capital, futures clearinghouse MBF Clearing Corp. and real estate companies Rudin Management and Related Companies. Quite a few financial insiders express frustration with Schumer, feeling hes thrown the industry under the bus now that its politically popular to do so after having collected mountains of cash from the industry to help the Democrats build their 60-vote majority in the Senate. Others contend that, despite his positions on the hot-button debates surrounding the financial reform effort, Schumer remains an important ally for Wall Street on the technical issues that arent grabbing headlines, such as systemic risk regulation and capital requirements for financial institutions.
And on regulatory reform, much of whats most important to financial firms exists in those more technical shadow lands.
In the end, he still understands the operation of the marketplace, explained one financial services executive. Schumer is also a player on securities and exchange issues, an important area for the securities and investment firms that call New York home and that have given Schumer almost half of his industry checks this cycle far more than any other member.
The hedge funds and private equity firms included in that giving also see him as something of a champion for them. Private equity, hedge funds, and venture capital firms gave him more than $707,100 during the 2010 cycle, nearly double what the industry has donated to any other member. Their support can be traced back to a 2007 battle over the carried interest bill that would have more than doubled the taxes paid by investment managers. The legislation passed the House, but momentum petered out in the Senate a victory some financial services lobbyists attribute to Schumer.
Schumer threatened to introduce legislation that would increase the taxes on carried interests for all industries, not just investment managers. His bill would have hit a litany of partnerships in industries far beyond private equity, such as real estate, oil and gas, and venture capitalists a poison pill for most lawmakers. By spreading the pain, Schumer made it difficult for any lawmaker to vote for the bill.
In addition to collecting money from Wall Street for himself, Schumer has helped Gillibrand, the states junior senator, get her share of industry dollars. Earlier this year, Schumer was instrumental in helping Gillibrand fend off possible 2010 challengers. In March, he co-hosted a $4,800-per-head fundraiser for her. And hes spent time introducing her to audiences across the state and donors in the financial services world. Reid and Dodd need no introductions; the industry knows full well that it can use their help.
Dodd has collected millions from the financial industry since his last reelection in 2004. But the Connecticut Democrat whos in for the toughest reelection fight of his career says theres little conflict between the industry donations and his legislative goals. Efforts to reform the system, says Dodd, will help the industry particularly smaller players like community banks. It strengthens these financial services, he says. People that work for these institutions know what has to be done, too.
All told, 19 of the 22 senators on Dodds Banking Committee have received checks from the financial industry this year, and each of those up for reelection in 2010 has received at least $180,000.
“Democrats insist that industry money doesnt influence their votes. “
I’ll comment once the bullsh** level drops here and I can see my boots again.
It is wose than that. I believe that the Wall Street has been infiltrated by Dums that are intent on destroying the Republic. They have manipulated the finacial markets to influence the Presidential elections. It has become increasingly clear as the Insane one says that the war weapon of choice is financial.
DemocRats.. looking the other way since FDR
How much did the IndyMac folks contribute?
Oh wait, they don’t exist anymore, huh?
They got gobbled up cheap by some of Chuckie’s bestest buddies.
The ‘Culture of Corruption’ does not come cheap, yaknow.
He used to have quite the appetite after chasing ambulances all day. Things haven’t changed.
GOP and Wall Street talk about an anachronism. The elites are all Demorats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.