Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Portnoy

The owner of the home did not strip it. The person who stripped it was a person was NOT the owner. The owner was the bank. The person who stripped the home is nothing but a vandal.


13 posted on 09/24/2009 6:56:38 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MIchaelTArchangel

Nope, he’s not a vandal until the final t is crossed and i dotted. If the bank hasn’t gotten a judgment when this is done it’s just “rehab” ~


17 posted on 09/24/2009 6:59:04 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Good point.


21 posted on 09/24/2009 7:00:35 AM PDT by Portnoy (Visit me at www.thehipposass.com or follow me on Twitter @thehipposass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

No doubt this thugess also lived in the house for perhaps up to a year after stopping payments. Mooch and a thief.


25 posted on 09/24/2009 7:02:49 AM PDT by PilotDave (America; nice while it lasted... I miss it already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

The bank is NOT THE OWNER until after the sale, title has not passed.


81 posted on 09/24/2009 8:01:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson