To: pissant
Actually the earliest papers not only were “non profit,” they had regular losses and were routinely subsidized by the political parties. So I guess not much has changed.
2 posted on
09/22/2009 3:27:40 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: LS
4 posted on
09/22/2009 3:32:16 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: LS
Well if the RAT party wants to subsidize the newspapers Ok as long as it is know that it is an organ of the RAT party, but he wants to have the rest of us subsidize these leftist rags. If that happens I will immediately cancel my subscriptions. I don't read them now, because I consider them history, but they if my taxes pay for them I don't.
Why in the world Obama wants the government to take over every failed business is just beyond me. Are the newspapers too big to fail? I think not.
5 posted on
09/22/2009 3:32:22 PM PDT by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson