Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

The solution would be addressing what drives the lawsuits. Yes, sometimes a victim really wants to screw the doctor, but most suits are out of fear of costs to be incurred in the future for the mistake that was made. The lawsuit provides a mechanism to get the capital needed to address those costs. Develop another source of capital and much of the suits will go down.


18 posted on 09/17/2009 10:09:12 AM PDT by DonaldC (A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DonaldC; Gideon7

Compensating a victim of medical malpractice, it’s almost inpossible to know how much compensation $$$ should be awarded without determining the facts of the case. So as along as tort reform doesn’t mess with that, and only punitive, I’d be okay with that. What does irritate me is the lack of disciplinary measures toward doctors who are consistantly negligent. Punitive damages are awarded by the court as a punishment because the court knows nothing (or it would be rare) will happen to the doc for being negligible. The old saying that a “mechanic has to fix their mistakes and a doctor buries them” is true. If a cap would be limited to $500,000, is that punishment enough? How about $500,000 and probation of license to practice?


25 posted on 09/17/2009 10:28:50 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson