Considering everything started from some common point during the "big bag", There is no "older and younger" starlight. It's just moving further away, which also causes it to "stretch out" and change frequencies giving the illusion of Older and younger starlight.
Without the assumption of millions of years, however, the fossil data begin to make much more sense.
Especially those chicken bones the Chinese bury after eating a chicken for for dinner, which these fossil hunters then dig up and claim are millions of years old, AND the missing link.
RU Series?
You think the light we think we're seeing from stars is actually from the Big Bang? It's just being stretched by some Divine stairmaster? Sunlight isn't actually from the Sun?
The light you see from stars billions of light years away was obviously created in a way that makes it ‘look’ like the stars are only a few thousand light years away. I can buy that. But why stop there? if the creator did that, why not accept he created the universe to ‘look’ billions of years old and life to ‘look’ evolved even if neither are true. That resolves science and faith perfectly without us returning to the Dark Ages.