Posted on 09/13/2009 12:07:08 AM PDT by PghBaldy
Hillary could not have united the people BO has. I also don’t see her bowing to the muslim King.
Never thought I’d EVER say I’d prefer hiltery over anyone.
I like Governor Palin for the same reasons I grew up liking Governor and later President Reagan (I used to listen to his radio addresses before he ran against Ford in '76). She makes sense.
I still wonder how she was selected as the VP candidate. Thats about the only good decision McCain made during the campaign.
I wonder about that too. The cynical side of me says that he chose a former beauty queen because that's the kind of man McCain is. But come on, your beauty queen wife waits patiently for you while you are being tortured in Vietnam. You finally come back and discover that she has had a disfiguring accident in the meantime and you divorce her? That's the best candidate the Republicans can come up with?
Obama can't increase demand so reduce supply !
First tried by Roosevelt, horrible failure.
I do not see BamaKennedy any farther left or radical than Hillary on any day of the week. Hillary made her own share of enemies within liberalville, else old Teddy Kennedy would not have ripped the proverbial political rug from under her 'Bobby Kennedy' styled campaign of 'We can do it better'.
As far as lord McCain goes, the only thing he did or said that gave him a prayer of a chance of winning was bringing Sarah to his ticket. For all practical purposes lord McCain was just a big a player in the long eight years of "HATE" all things Bush as any self identified liberal. Even those independent moderates he slavishly day in and day out prostituted himself to, turned their noses up at him and would have stayed home or voted for Hillary.
Since the Republicans and in particular conservatives did not choose lord McCain in 2000, lord McCain showed his 'primary colors' (title of a book) over the next eight years, and quite frankly he himself made himself unelectable.
I do not believe for one minute had Hillary been elected with majorities in both houses she would be doing anything any differently than BamaKennedy. The only difference would be a raging "I AM" white woman versus the raging "I AM" biracial person this nation ended up electing.
there is one reason and one reason only for the decline of private property in the inner cities (and else where) ...... Property Taxes. Get rid of property taxes and the problem is solved.
Repeal the 17th Amendment!
Hillary did not win because old Teddy Kennedy anointed and adopted BamaKennedy as the reincarnation of JFK. Now that is the method of operation BamaKennedy has always used to get himself elected, remove, destroy, discredit, any and all opposition so there is really no challenge. Old Teddy and BamaKennedy knew exactly WHO they were reaching out to with this 'religious' elevation of BamaKennedy by and from old Teddy and the daughter of JFK, Caroline. JFK voters!!!!! And if the data is correct that is exactly who they got inspired to vote for Bama. I can say that because of people I know who in political terms fit the JFK voters profile.
But to say Hillary is different that BamaKennedy ignores who old Hillary was as co-president during the 90's. The more she was opposed the harder she fought.
Giant drug infested roach motel projects
Imagine if urban cities didn’t get welfare, foodstamps, Federal grants?
Cites, once centers of industry,energy and profit are now taxpayer money sucking black holes and breeding and raising pens for Democrat votes.
I was hoping they would bull doze all of Chicago, but of course, the white house mafia will have none of that.
The system is very much in control. What is happening is the natural, albeit, opposite of the usual delusions of centralized planned economy.
“breeding and raising pens for Democrat votes.”
What else does a tyrant need?
Reminds me of the 1960’s slogan, “Urban Renewal Means Negro Removal.”, chanted by black activists.
bump !!!
“Yeah they can have Memphis....”
I don’t disagree with you about the crime statistics. However, I have found the people there to be the friendliest and most helpful of any large city I have been in. I’m in Memphis and other large metro areas several times a year. Another really friendly place - Houston. Nothing scientific - just basing it on my personal experiences.
Um...
I was 10 in 1967. How exactly was I supposed to "beat down" the hippies?
Also...
I don't exactly see the following "generations" beating them down, either. In fact, I don't see the following generations doing much of anything except have inflated egos and whine alot. Just. Like. You.
He who is without sin and all that...
NO, NO, NO!!!! He's much more than that. He's also brimming with vacuous slogans, empty promises, hare-brained schemes and stale collectist plans.
Reminds me of "Cash for Clunkers": Economic policy grounded in the broken window fallacy.
The man is delusional. He's in Ceausescu mode: penning up the peasants in high rise government owned slums. Ask any refugee from the Bronx: How'd that work out for you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.