To: 2banana
Without massive subsidies, neither solar nor wind can replace coal or nuclear power for generating electricity.
6 posted on
09/08/2009 6:58:54 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: The Great RJ
Even with unlimited subsidies neither can work.
24 posted on
09/08/2009 7:37:51 AM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: The Great RJ
Without massive subsidies, neither solar nor wind can replace coal or nuclear power for generating electricity.
Yes and no. If you run an energy-intensive industry, you need 24/7 baseload power. But prices for solar cells have halved over the last year. We're getting close to a point where it makes sense for WalMart (large commercial buildings, access to credit and / or cash at hand) to cover its roofs with solar cell to run the daytime air conditioning rather than pay peak rates. And that would be regardless of subsidies.
The car didn't replace the train as the dominant mode of transportation all at once, it first conquered specific niches. And that is the point where solar is right now. Where we go from there is up to the market to decide (how will the price for coal, for natural gas, for uranium develop, or in the case of solar cell manufacturing: high-grad silicon or arsenic?).
28 posted on
09/08/2009 7:49:50 AM PDT by
wolf78
(Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson