Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno
that's standard bio stuff. I live in Illinois.

The media didn't vet her for crap. I'm betting neither did the FBI

How a bout this for starters:

Have you heard about Jarrett's involvement in Michelle Obama’s patient-dumping scheme at the University of Chicago Medical Center, where Jarrett sat of the board of directors ?

Or

How about Jarrett's involvement in Grove Parc — the Chicago slum complex managed by Jarrett's company, Habitat, Inc. To this day, Jarrett refuses to answer questions about the dilapidated housing development.

or her jones gushing

" Oooh. Van Jones, alright! So, Van Jones. We were so delighted to be able to recruit him into the White House. We were watching him, uh, really, he's not that old, for as long as he's been active out in Oakland. And all the creative ideas he has. And so now, we have captured that. And we have all that energy in the White House."
25 posted on 09/06/2009 4:47:22 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a

More about Obama’s “consigliere”
Bookworm on Jul 27 2009 at 10:43 am | Filed under: Barack Obama, Media matters

Michelle Malkin has a great take-down of a NYT week end magazine article about Valerie Jarrett, pointing out all of the things the Times conveniently omitted from the its glowing review of this important behind-the-scenes player in the Obama White House.

I actually saw the same story on-line last week and blogged about it at the time:

Read this and, aside from hearing effusive praise for Valerie Jarrett, the President’s consigliere, you also learn so much about Obama. Just on the first page, you learn that he’s whiny, bad-tempered, lazy, ill-informed, stubborn, a loose cannon, and, when it comes to strong women, submissive. (Oh, gee, just the qualities I want in my president.) It’s strange when a loving NY Times article sounds as mean as a less than loving National Review article. Jarrett’s power is a bit creepy, especially given that she is a true Chicago political insider (and that’s no compliment). But what makes the article really amazing is the way in which it demeans Obama as a way of highlighting Jarrett’s behind-the-scenes control. As for Jarrett, she bears further examination, given her control over the President.

I’m delighted to see that Michelle has done precisely the “further examination” I thought so necessary. It’s just a shame that most New York Times readers will never learn (or want to learn) the whole story.

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/07/27/more-about-obamas-consigliere/


26 posted on 09/06/2009 4:51:36 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Integrity is the lifeblood of democracy. Deceit is a poison in it." - Ted Kennedy (D-HELL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson