1 posted on
09/03/2009 9:03:32 PM PDT by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
So much for separation of church and state....
2 posted on
09/03/2009 9:08:23 PM PDT by
freebilly
( No wonder all the left has a boner for Obama.... There's "Cialis" in "SoCIALISt")
To: Steelfish
We live in interesting times. An opportunity to reassert our constitutional religious freedoms and hopefully revisit the idea of church and state.
This judge hopefully will find he has over reached.
4 posted on
09/03/2009 9:11:51 PM PDT by
swheats
(Time is the greatest equalizer. Seek God in America Again. Be fruitful and multiply.)
To: Steelfish
Nice going ‘Dad’. Get your daughter put in a public school. That’ll show your ex-wife.
6 posted on
09/03/2009 9:13:01 PM PDT by
ReneeLynn
(Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black.)
To: Steelfish
First Amendment: REVOKED!
7 posted on
09/03/2009 9:13:13 PM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Steelfish
Amanda's "vigorous defense of her religious beliefs ... suggests strongly that she has not had the opportunity to seriously consider any other point of view," District Court Judge Lucinda V. Sadler said. Or, Lucinda, you sorry sack of excretement, maybe she actually BELIEVES it and holds dear those religious beliefs. Who on earth is being the intolerant one?
Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!
AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY
A PETITION ON FACEBOOK FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION
8 posted on
09/03/2009 9:13:37 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Steelfish
This is a sad situation.
Broken home, broken lives. And now the court is dictating to the custodial parent how the child should be educated.
I'd really like to know more about the parents and the particular faith before I commented on this.
But I can tell you for sure without knowing more than I do, that I don't like the court deciding the educational avenue the parents should have a right to choose for their children.
It just doesn't sound like the US of A that I grew up in.
9 posted on
09/03/2009 9:19:33 PM PDT by
Hillarys nightmare
(So Proud to be living in "Jesus Land" ! Don't you wish everyone did?)
To: Steelfish
The Puritans sailed from England bound for the New World in search of the opportunity to have freedom to practice their (choice of) religion.
To: Steelfish
if the father said he wanted her to go to a mainstream private school, I could understand. But don’t make kids the ward of the state.
11 posted on
09/03/2009 9:24:18 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
To: Steelfish
The ruling also said Amanda told a counselor she was distressed by her father's refusal to accept her religious beliefs and that "his choice to spend eternity away from her proves that he does not love her as much as he says he does." Amanda really does have the sperm donor pegged.
12 posted on
09/03/2009 9:25:24 PM PDT by
Lauren BaRecall
(I am only ONE of many real Jim Thompsons, yet I am ONE.)
To: Steelfish
If the mother in this situation simply moved out of state would it be possible to escape this order?
13 posted on
09/03/2009 9:27:41 PM PDT by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: Steelfish
Amanda's "vigorous defense of her religious beliefs ... suggests strongly that she has not had the opportunity to seriously consider any other point of view," District Court Judge Lucinda V. Sadler said. I suppose this Judge also thinks its a bad thing that a parent would want to keep their child free from exposure to drugs, ebola, plague, and other 'opportunities'...
Yes, the mother wants to bring up her daughter in a Christian environment and she doesn't appreciate people who would want to attack her beliefs at her young age. How unreasonable...
God save us from these judges who want to play god...
17 posted on
09/03/2009 9:50:50 PM PDT by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Steelfish
AND WHO DECIDES WHEN THE COURT’S VIEWS ARE TOO EXTREME???
To: Steelfish
29 posted on
09/03/2009 10:40:46 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: Steelfish
I'm not at all surprised this judge was a female.
And I'm guessing the divorced father turned homo?
To: Steelfish
34 posted on
09/03/2009 11:11:08 PM PDT by
karnage
(worn arguments and old attitudes)
To: Steelfish
New Hampshire now has something in common with Nazi Germany. Germany got that anti-homeschool law from Adolph Hitler and KEEPS IT!
37 posted on
09/04/2009 3:54:17 AM PDT by
RoadTest
( Confounded be all they that serve graven images, that boast themselves of idols - Psalm 97:12a)
To: Steelfish
new Hampshire is the state that claims to have the motto, "Live free or die" and the place
http://freestate.org/ says they are using as a place for free thinkers to congregate.
they picked the wrong state their motto changed to, "better to be red then dead."
42 posted on
09/05/2009 2:53:14 PM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson