Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Oops, I confused FANNIE MAE with GINNIE MAE, my bad.


10 posted on 09/03/2009 2:28:20 AM PDT by 101voodoo (OBAMA- THE OPIATE FOR THE DUMB ASSES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: 101voodoo
The differences with Ginnie Mae are structural and substantial, though on surface negligible. Ginnie's debt is explicitly guaranteed by the government GNMA is not a GSE, which Fannie and Freddie were before "nationalization".

Besides private profits and public losses, there are also differences in regulation and level of long-term risk / guarantees.

Simplistically, what they are actually trying to do is to recreate another, bigger, public-private GSE (MCGE) from remnants of Fannie and Freddie, offload "bad assets" to taxpayers ("bad bank"), get the "good assets" to private investment firms ("good bank"), and guarantee any losses to them.

GSEs and public-private enterprises are actually favorite ways of socialist / fascist strategists under the guise of Third Way economic structure. Tony Blair was the most ardent proponent of Third Way, with Clintons just slightly less explicit - they didn't use the name.

13 posted on 09/03/2009 3:32:11 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson