Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/02/2009 11:24:57 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Salvation; narses

ping


2 posted on 09/02/2009 11:27:07 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ez 38 Pray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Will never pass, but I applaud him for trying.


3 posted on 09/02/2009 11:28:58 AM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I see a big money making scheme here for lower life forms.

Jamal will claim to be the father and sign the paperwork for $20 and a pack of Kools.

How are they going to verify who the father is until the baby is born?


5 posted on 09/02/2009 11:31:35 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

This man is my new hero. My third child was murdered because my ex-wife decided she didn’t want to be bothered having it. I had no say whatsoever.


6 posted on 09/02/2009 11:32:02 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Fair’s fair. They are have all the responsibilities but none of the rights in these situations.


7 posted on 09/02/2009 11:35:16 AM PDT by Marie2 (The second mouse gets the cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I support this in concept. But how does it work on the flip side? If the guy wants his baby murdered and she refuses, can he plead off child support?


8 posted on 09/02/2009 11:39:42 AM PDT by mockingbyrd (Boehner Baby!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

About time, isn’t it? Won’t THIS be popular with the left!!


14 posted on 09/02/2009 12:20:23 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I’d like to see it pass if only because it would have SCOTUS members ordering their Maalox in 55 gallon drums.

This is the same SCOTUS which ruled that stopping you in your car at random for a DUI checkpoint is constitutional, AND that burning the American Flag is protected free speech.

(I always thought that if someone were to get stopped at at DUI checkpoint, get out of his car and set fire to a flag, it would tie our entire Federal Court system in knots for the next 13 years...)


15 posted on 09/02/2009 12:24:07 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

it’s about damned time someone did this. why does the woman have rights regarding the termination of a child but the father has none? that is wrong on so many levels. No one should have the right to kill a child, period, but to destroy a mans child without even discussing it with him is just f@$##%@! heinous.


18 posted on 09/02/2009 12:33:25 PM PDT by madamemayhem (defeat isn't getting knocked down, it's not getting back up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

pro-life ping


20 posted on 09/02/2009 12:35:39 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Waaaaayyy overdue.


21 posted on 09/02/2009 12:40:05 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Count me on board.


22 posted on 09/02/2009 12:51:57 PM PDT by CSM (Business is too big too fail... Government is too big to succeed... I am too small to matter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Won't pass, can't pass.

Either you give a father veto power or you don't.
And they won't. (Or rather, if they do, it'll be struck down.)

23 posted on 09/02/2009 1:30:22 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Obi-Wan Palin: Strike her down and she shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Seems to me that if a woman bears 100% of the responsibility for the choice to have an abortion, she should bear 100% of the burden for the consequences of having the child. A father, therefore, should be able to opt out of paying child support.

100% her decision, 100% her financial burden.

Fair is fair.


29 posted on 09/02/2009 6:20:40 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

They need to push this over and over and over until one day it goes through.

No surrender.


34 posted on 09/02/2009 9:16:09 PM PDT by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

No, no, males don’t count and it isn’t a real baby yet anyway!/SAR. Worthless POS that would kill a child as if they are taking care of an unwanted kitten or puppy(and that sucks too).


46 posted on 09/02/2009 9:33:42 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; sauropod; Lil'freeper

Odds of passage?


64 posted on 09/06/2009 7:40:57 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Anyone pushing Romney must love socialism...Piss on Romney and his enablers!!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson