Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama addresses immigration reform (yesterday's meeting)
Politico ^ | August 20, 2009 | Josh Gerstein

Posted on 08/21/2009 12:25:04 PM PDT by La Lydia

President Barack Obama on Thursday managed to undo some of the damage he did recently with immigrants’ rights advocates — who were angered when Obama said in Mexico that immigration reform would have to wait until after health care and energy bills passed Congress. Obama dropped in on a White House meeting with more than 100 immigration reform backers — and the message, according to some who were there, was that Obama would push for immigration reform even as the health-care debate continues to unfold.

“I think he’s more forward-leaning,” said Angela Kelley, an immigration reform expert with the liberal Center for American Progress think tank. “The takeaway from Mexico was that this is just kicking the can down the road. The takeaway from today is they’re rolling up their sleeves and leaning heavy into the issue.”...

“He’s doing this and health care. He didn’t give an inkling that he’s going to back away from immigration reform. I think he’s ready to do the heavy lifting,” said Kelley. The session was officially hosted by Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano...

The meeting included advocacy groups, religious organizations, unions, employers and law enforcement. United Farm Workers Union President Arturo Rodriguez said participants delivered blunt messages to Napolitano that she needed to adjust her public message....

Participants said both Obama and Napolitano both brought up controversial arrangements under which local police partner with the federal government to enforce immigration laws. Critics have accused some local officials of using such deals to harass immigrants and, in some cases, U.S. citizens. Obama and Napolitano said local officials must be held “accountable” for their actions under the program, known as 287(g), attendees said.

The media was not allowed into the meeting, but Napolitano later issued a written statement emphasizing her commitment to reform.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; amnesty; bho44; bhocira; bhoillegals; illegals
No media allowed. Only heaven knows what really was said and what was promised.
1 posted on 08/21/2009 12:25:05 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Obama will keep it up until he has angered everyone except his wife.


2 posted on 08/21/2009 12:27:50 PM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

His modus operandi is to say one thing publicly to average Americans who cling to their guns and religion, and another thing behind closed doors to his political allies.


3 posted on 08/21/2009 12:28:07 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

And everyone knows she’s angry most of the time, anyway.


4 posted on 08/21/2009 12:29:18 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

I heard someone on FOX state that the Supreme Court has already ruled that immigrants have the right to social benefits, so being covered under Obamacare doesn’t have to be a written statement. It just will be.

Also, all the SEIU members, who are government contract workers will be given all the same benefits as US citizens, so citizenship will be a moot point.


5 posted on 08/21/2009 12:31:24 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntbee; Tennessee Nana

Here’s one for you all.


6 posted on 08/21/2009 12:32:08 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

The Supreme Court? I don’t think so. Do you have a link? They are prohibited by law from getting certain social benefits (not that it stops all of them). Are you talking about a recent ruling?


7 posted on 08/21/2009 12:34:08 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Keep your powder dry folks, there’s more than one fight coming.


8 posted on 08/21/2009 12:35:49 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Time to roll up the other sleeve.


9 posted on 08/21/2009 12:37:30 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Prop 87 was thrown out in Cal and Gay Davis decided not to appeal it. I understand the Arizona law was upheld in court.


10 posted on 08/21/2009 12:38:35 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport, and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

No, it was just a guy on Greta’s show, I think. He might have been from the Politico, but I wouldn’t swear to it.


11 posted on 08/21/2009 12:43:56 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

No, it was just a guy on Greta’s show, I think. He might have been from the Politico, but I wouldn’t swear to it.


12 posted on 08/21/2009 12:44:37 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Why doesn’t the Thug just put illegal aliens in charge? After all, that’s who we’re really working for.


13 posted on 08/21/2009 12:47:22 PM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

the KosKids are right....Bam is WEAK and can be ROLLED!


14 posted on 08/21/2009 1:25:14 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

So, whoever the guy was on FOX didn’t really know what he was talking about? ....or maybe I mis-understood him, but I am certain that the guy said that the Supreme court stated that the immigrants were entitled to government benefits. Maybe he was referring to public education and extrapolating from that.


15 posted on 08/21/2009 1:26:56 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Legally they can have emergency medical treatment and their spawn can attend public school. That’s about it. But in many places, they live in public housing (while citizens are put on a waiting list) and collect food stamps and such.


16 posted on 08/21/2009 1:43:28 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson