I’m simply pointing out that the article is internally inconsistent. You have to pick a point of view and stick with it or your message gets fuzzy, just like the left-wingers.
And your .7 degrees is not accurate. The data are still being re-reviewed with the knowledge that it’s been consistently skewed since 2000 or so. Also 80% of the temperature recording stations don’t meet the NOAA guidelines for temperature recording stations and should be considered invalid.
How’s that?
So, you are lobbying for less than 0.7 deg. C., for the past 100 years ?
I can certainly go with that.
We are slowly rebounding from the last glaciation, so you can’t wipe it all out.
I do agree that tempwise we have been on a downhill from 1998.
I too, agree that earth based measurements are way too full off fertility, and the satellite measurements are the ones to go by.
The 100 year number varies greatly depending on what your start and end dates are. Way too much wiggle room for the Warmers to splash around in.