Skip to comments.
Lindsey Graham gives as good as he gets
Politico ^
| 7-24-09
Posted on 07/24/2009 8:13:13 AM PDT by STARWISE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
I have no desire to be up here in an irrelevant status." ~~~~
ROLF! You couldn't BE any more irrelevant with your spineless stands, Lindseygirl.
1
posted on
07/24/2009 8:13:15 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
To: STARWISE
Boy, that headline is all kinds of wrong.
2
posted on
07/24/2009 8:13:59 AM PDT
by
perfect_rovian_storm
(The worst is behind us. Unfortunately it is really well endowed.)
To: penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; April Lexington; ...
~~PING!
South Carolina FReepers: rain holyhell upon this wimp!
3
posted on
07/24/2009 8:14:12 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: STARWISE
right-wing talk show......conservative Judicial Confirmation Network...Marginalization: the napalm of politics.
4
posted on
07/24/2009 8:15:30 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(The revolution IS being televised.)
To: perfect_rovian_storm
you mean the choice of personal pronoun?
5
posted on
07/24/2009 8:15:53 AM PDT
by
rahbert
To: STARWISE
Something about this headline gives me the laughing fits...LOL!!
Gads......
6
posted on
07/24/2009 8:16:07 AM PDT
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: penelopesire
7
posted on
07/24/2009 8:17:17 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: STARWISE
Dear Lindsey SpectRE, Thank you for your honesty. Please join your brother on the other side of the isle, ASAP.
Signed,
A Proud CONSERVATIVE who isn't so whimpy and STANDS UP for what she believes in...and feels that DOING THE RIGHT THING ISN'T ALWAYS EASY, BUT IT'S ALWAYS RIGHT!!!
BYE BYE WHEN IT COMES TIME TO RE-ELECT YOUR SORRY BEHIND
8
posted on
07/24/2009 8:18:54 AM PDT
by
NordP
("....He pulls a knife, U pull a gun. He sends 1 of urs 2 hosp U send his 2 morgue = Chicago Way")
To: STARWISE
I dont want to politicize the judiciary any more than has been done, Graham said. My goal is to ensure the rule of law isnt taken over by special-interest groups. He is nothing more than a master of political double speak as the above quote illustrates. McCain and Graham, Specter and so many other rinos are predictable disappointments. Is it really a surprise that republicans are in the minority?
9
posted on
07/24/2009 8:19:01 AM PDT
by
GBA
To: STARWISE
How long has he been in office?
TOO LONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He was present when this disaster took place
YOUR FIRED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10
posted on
07/24/2009 8:19:35 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
To: STARWISE
Reminder Memo of Grah-amnesty: Remove from Congress in 2010 election.
11
posted on
07/24/2009 8:20:31 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
I cannot stand Miss Lindsay Graham-nesty. The Dems must have a really good file of pictures and video to blackmail this sissy with.
12
posted on
07/24/2009 8:22:51 AM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Remember when Bush was President and Americans had jobs (and ammo)?)
To: STARWISE
If the electorate were so sensitive, then the vicious treatment given Clarence Thomas would have resulted in a landslide for Republicans. We're not asking for Sotomayor to be tarred, feathered, and driven out of town on a rail... just vote NO. Vote your convictions, not what is politically expedient.
It takes courage to do that, it takes courage to vote knowing it 'might' mean you don't win re-election, but if our troops must stand in the line of fire, in harms way, how can we ask our politicians to show any less courage to simply VOTE based on the law and what is best for the country? Sotomayor is NOT the best we can offer this country.
It isn't about being 'liked'. It is about being 'right'. Most of us left concern for being 'liked' behind when we walked out of the high school door with a diploma in hand.
13
posted on
07/24/2009 8:26:33 AM PDT
by
1-Eagle
(SUPPORT - The Constitutional Law of Honduras!)
To: STARWISE
When I was in high school, we referred to people like Lindsey as a pussy. Hey Lindsey, you are irrelevant... do you not remember the last presidential campaign? The guy you slept with lost... go pound sand!
14
posted on
07/24/2009 8:27:05 AM PDT
by
opaque soul
(Condensing gas to solid state, truth the soul does make opaque.)
To: STARWISE
Why doesnt Lindsey just become a Democrat and get it over with....
15
posted on
07/24/2009 8:27:52 AM PDT
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(I thought Obama was half-white?)
To: All
A stunning illustration of his irrelevance, incoherence and derangement:
Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993.
16
posted on
07/24/2009 8:28:45 AM PDT
by
STARWISE
(The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
To: STARWISE
Graham is the first Republican on the Judiciary Committee to support her. He may be the only one. The sad thing about this RINO's position is that in order to get out of the Judiciary Committee Judge Sotomoyer has to have at least one "Yes" vote from a Republican on the committee. If the Republicans in the Judiciary Committee were unanimous in their dissent, she is rejected.
This is the only way we can defeat her nomination.....and Lindsey Graham is blowing it for the party.
17
posted on
07/24/2009 8:31:31 AM PDT
by
Retired COB
(Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
To: STARWISE
Grahamnesty is the poster boy for the old saying that “If you don’t STAND for something, you’ll FALL for anything.”
The argument by the increasingly silly and irrelevant Lindsey Graham that Sotomayor is no worse than Souter is akin to a doctor telling you that your lung cancer is cured but you have leukemia. I heard Graham remark that The President has a right to get the people he wants. That logic says that if Obama WANTS to abolish an elected legislature for a politbureau of his fellow Chicago thugs which he is in the process of doing with his czars, — you should simply roll over, move on and let him have it.
And this guy is a LAWYER?? Good grief!!
18
posted on
07/24/2009 8:32:49 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(ELECTION 2010 IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OF OUR LIFETIME! If you have to ask why, UR part of the problem!)
To: STARWISE
Linsgay earns his kneepad status.
19
posted on
07/24/2009 8:33:06 AM PDT
by
maggief
To: STARWISE
Sen. Grahamnesty’s idea of tough question: “Do you have a temperment problem?” Too bad the metrosexual didn’t have the cajones to ask her about her criminal association in the DeLano matter.
20
posted on
07/24/2009 8:34:29 AM PDT
by
Nephi
( Support Fascism: Buy GE, GM and Chrysler products! You already buy gasoline.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson