Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary rules out military government in Pakistan
Pakistan Daily Times ^ | 7/20/09 | staff

Posted on 07/20/2009 4:01:47 PM PDT by pissant

LAHORE: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has ruled out the possibility of an undemocratic or military government coming into power in Islamabad, saying that a weak government in Pakistan will be harmful for India too, an Indian TV channel reported on Monday.

“There is no appetite, at least as we speak today, to return to a non-democratic, military government,” she said in an interview with the channel.

Talking about Pakistan’s nuclear assets, Clinton said that at this time, the nuclear command-and-control structure was well managed. “Now that is something that we are all concerned about. It’s one of the reasons that I will be talking to my Indian counterparts about how we can prevent the proliferation of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction to rogue states or non-state actors and other terrorist groups,” she said.

The secretary of state said the Pakistani government and the people even more so, were very committed to their own fight against terrorism.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailytimes.com.pk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: bhoasia; india; larrysinclairslover; obama; pakistan; pawkeestahn; queenhillary; soshillary
For not wanting to meddle in foreign countries' affairs, the boy marxist is doing a helluva lot of meddling.
1 posted on 07/20/2009 4:01:48 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
Who woke up H!?

We haven't heard much from her lately, 'till now.

2 posted on 07/20/2009 4:06:45 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

MYOB, hillary, MYOB.


3 posted on 07/20/2009 4:09:56 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Did she rule out a military government for the USA?????


4 posted on 07/20/2009 4:10:07 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I bet her next step is to stop the tide from rising


5 posted on 07/20/2009 4:28:29 PM PDT by sitkaspruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
“Inconceivable!”
6 posted on 07/20/2009 4:41:11 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (In Soviet Russia, Sarah Palin's house can see YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is/will GE a big player here?


7 posted on 07/20/2009 4:47:38 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foreign/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

““There is no appetite, at least as we speak today, to return to a non-democratic, snip...unsnip government,” she said in an interview with the channel.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Military or non-military, I share this sentiment. What biles me is the qualifier “at least as we speak today”!!!!!

I have no appetite, for as long as I breathe, to live under a non-democratic government symbolized by the likes of 0ur dear leader.


8 posted on 07/20/2009 5:40:38 PM PDT by hotshu (Keep the Faith, that will be the only thing 0bama doesn't take from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson