Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In effect, there’s no evidence for the multiverse; it is an attractive idea because it makes our current cosmological values and fine tuning appear random. Hence, this line from the article :

Greene’s transformation is emblematic of a profound change among the majority of physicists. Until recently, many were reluctant to accept this idea of the “multiverse”, or were even belligerent towards it. However, recent progress in both cosmology and string theory is bringing about a major shift in thinking. Gone is the grudging acceptance or outright loathing of the multiverse. Instead, physicists are starting to look at ways of working with it, and maybe even trying to prove its existence.

If such ventures succeed, our universe will go the way of Earth - from seeming to be the centre of everything to being exposed as just a backwater in a far vaster cosmos. And just as we are unable to deduce certain aspects of Earth from first principles - such as its radius or distance from the sun - we will have to accept that some things about our universe are a random accident, inexplicable except in the context of the multiverse.

However, if our universe is part of a multiverse then we can ascribe the value of the cosmological constant to an accident. The same goes for other aspects of our universe, such as the mass of the electron. The idea is simply that each universe’s laws of physics and fundamental constants are randomly determined, and we just happen to live in one where these are suited for life. “If not for the multiverse, you would have these unsolved problems at every corner,” says Linde.

1 posted on 07/14/2009 6:09:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Hmm seems like they just made it up to make their equations make sense.


2 posted on 07/14/2009 6:10:55 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

You know, some freeper is going to read this and post something silly:

“String theory requires that the universe has a property known as supersymmetry, which posits that every particle known to physicists has a heavier and as yet unseen superpartner.”

I have that book, Parallel Worlds,or whatever by that guy Macchu Pichu, and it is difficult, to say the least.

parsy, who tries to keep up but geeeesh


5 posted on 07/14/2009 6:21:23 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Justice League comics were pushing this almost 50 years ago. It allowed DC to retool popular superheroes (eg Flash) and bring back the old versions from “the other Earth” every once in a while.


7 posted on 07/14/2009 6:35:30 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (we also have the duty to avoid prostituting our Catholic identity by appeals to phony dialogue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


9 posted on 07/14/2009 6:36:50 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


10 posted on 07/14/2009 6:36:58 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
So far I haven't seen any "proof" that the mathematics underlying the construction of the "multiverse" need to be "random" in any respect.

Maybe they're random; maybe they're not; that has not yet been determined, nor, considering the vast differences involved, can it.

11 posted on 07/14/2009 6:45:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

12 posted on 07/14/2009 7:00:48 PM PDT by The Duke ("Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Democrat Party?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“If not for the multiverse, you would have these unsolved problems at every corner,” says Linde.

Baaah! If you didn’t have multiverse you wouldn’t HAVE
corners.


16 posted on 07/14/2009 7:57:51 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Best metaphor I ever encountered:

An old (1960’s) Astro Boy cartoon where he explained it as the other side of a piece of paper.


17 posted on 07/14/2009 7:59:35 PM PDT by P.O.E. ((optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

B4l8r


19 posted on 07/14/2009 8:21:06 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought string theory had been disproved and M-theory had replaced it with membranes instead of strings.


21 posted on 07/15/2009 11:16:28 AM PDT by BubbaBasher ("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson