Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2009 2:31:54 PM PDT by areukiddingme1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: areukiddingme1
Good vanity. Some good points. This is what vanities were intended to be.

BTW, Happy (belated) FRanniversary!

2 posted on 07/14/2009 2:36:31 PM PDT by magslinger (Inside every father is a Bryan Mills waiting to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1
Are you not checked for HIV/AIDS before admittance?
3 posted on 07/14/2009 2:38:09 PM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTEXASA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

VERY good post.


5 posted on 07/14/2009 2:42:08 PM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

VERY good post.


6 posted on 07/14/2009 2:42:16 PM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

The scenario you describe has happened all too frequently in the US military for many years, but not with HIV, with hepatitis.

Hepatitis is in fact the more serious threat, because different types are spread not just by blood contamination, but orally as well. Besides that, the military has to contend on a regular basis with bacterial and viral meningitis outbreaks, severe outbreaks of MRSA, Necrotizing Fasciitis (the “flesh eating” bacteria), and the ever popular, if less lethal Norwalk virus and Influenza.

This is not to justify homosexuals in the military, but among their other problems, HIV transmission is pretty low on the totem pole. The military also tests for it, regularly, and it is grounds for discharge.


8 posted on 07/14/2009 2:43:56 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

bump.

(footnote: remember active homosexuals can not donate blood)


9 posted on 07/14/2009 2:45:56 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

That was a wonderful explanation
about how the Gay lifestyle
does not belong
in the military


14 posted on 07/14/2009 2:54:20 PM PDT by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1
FDRQ need not apply...
18 posted on 07/14/2009 3:34:00 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

One of the better vanities I’ve read here at FR.

Our servicemen deserve better. Much better.


19 posted on 07/14/2009 4:15:22 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

Aren’t gays already allowed in the military? How does letting them serve openly affect this?


20 posted on 07/15/2009 6:53:44 AM PDT by texas101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areukiddingme1

Why the post? Are you truly concerned with the health and efficiency of the military or are you trying to further the homosexual agenda with isolated examples? I suspect the latter.


22 posted on 07/15/2009 3:48:05 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson