To: SandRat
A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
...
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.
8 posted on
07/10/2009 9:56:44 PM PDT by
JRochelle
("I wasn't briefed about the briefing, I was only informed." SanFranNan.)
To: JRochelle
Actually, if this was forced just on Detroit, LA and New York City....I wouldn’t have any problem with this plan.
To: JRochelle
.. with official permission, ..That's a major problem.
19 posted on
07/10/2009 10:15:19 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: JRochelle
A simpler way to do it would just be to kill the male newborn children... Hey, they could toss them in the river!
Mark
82 posted on
07/11/2009 5:58:33 AM PDT by
MarkL
(Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
To: JRochelle
A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.Why, pray tell, is that? Because men can run faster? Because the gubmint has made sure that no woman will have a male protector?
Leftists are soulless ghouls.
131 posted on
07/11/2009 9:57:47 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
(If ten percent is good enough for Jesus, it ought to be good enough for Uncle Sam. --Ray Stevens)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson