Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmaker: CIA Chief Ends 'Serious' Covert Program
NPR ^ | 10 June 2009 | NPR

Posted on 07/10/2009 11:21:30 AM PDT by BGHater

CIA Director Leon Panetta has terminated a "very serious" covert program the spy agency kept secret from Congress for eight years, Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a House Intelligence subcommittee chairwoman, said Friday.

Schakowsky is pressing for an immediate committee investigation of the classified program, which has not been described publicly. Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has said he is considering an investigation.

"The program is a very, very serious program and certainly deserved a serious debate at the time and through the years," Schakowsky said in an interview with The Associated Press. "But now it's over."

Democrats revealed late Tuesday that CIA Director Leon Panetta had informed members of the House Intelligence Committee on June 24 that the spy agency had been withholding important information about a secret intelligence program begun after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Schakowsky described Panetta as "stunned" that he had not been informed of the program until nearly five months into his tenure as director.

Panetta had learned of the program only the day before informing the lawmakers, according to a U.S. intelligence official. The official spoke on condition of anonymity Friday because he was not authorized to discuss the program publicly.

Panetta has launched an internal probe at the CIA to determine why Congress was not told about the program. Exactly what the classified program entailed is still unclear.

The intelligence official said the program was "on-again/off-again" and that it was never fully operational, but he would not provide details.

Schakowsky (D-IL) said Friday that the CIA and Bush administration consciously decided not to tell Congress.

"It's not as if this was an oversight and over the years it just got buried. There was a decision under several directors of the CIA and administration not to tell the Congress," she said.

Schakowsky, who chairs the Intelligence subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said in a letter to Reyes on Thursday that the CIA's lying was systematic and inexcusable.

She said Reyes indicated to her the committee would conduct a probe into whether the CIA violated the National Security Act, which requires, with rare exceptions, that Congress be informed of covert activities. She said she hopes to conduct at least part of the investigation for the committee.

Schakowsk also noted that this is the fourth time she knows of that the CIA has misled Congress or not informed it in a timely manner since she began serving on the Intelligence Committee two and half years ago.

In 2008, the CIA inspector general revealed that the CIA had lied to Congress about the accidental shoot down of American missionaries over Peru in 2001. In 2007, news reports disclosed that the CIA had secretly destroyed videotapes of interrogations of a terrorist suspect.

She would not describe the other incident.

Schakowsky said she thinks Panetta is changing the CIA for the better, adding that the failure to inform Congress was indicative of "contempt" the Bush administration and intelligence agencies under him held for Congress.

"Many times I felt it was an annoyance to them to have to come to us and answer our questions," she said. "There was an impatience and a contempt for the Congress."

The House is expected to take up the 2010 intelligence authorization bill next week. It includes a provision that would require the White House to inform the entire committee about upcoming covert operations rather than just the "Gang of Eight" — the senior members from both parties on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees and the Democratic and Republican leaders in both houses.

The White House this week threatened to veto the final version of the bill if it includes that provision. Democratic aides said the language may be softened in negotiations with the Senate to address the White House's concern.

But Schakowsky said the wider briefings are the best remedy to avoiding future notification abuses.

Republicans charge that Democratic outrage about the Panetta revelation is just an attempt to provide political cover to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who in May accused the CIA of lying to her in 2002 about its use of waterboarding.

What Pelosi knew about the CIA's interrogation program and when she knew it — and why she did not object to it sooner — is expected to be emphasized by Republicans during debate over the intelligence bill.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhocia; cia; covert; intelligence; panetta; schakowsky; spying

1 posted on 07/10/2009 11:21:30 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater
But Schakowsky said the wider briefings are the best remedy to avoiding future notification abuses effective operations of the CIA.
2 posted on 07/10/2009 11:24:56 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Republicans charge that Democratic outrage about the Panetta revelation is just an attempt to provide political cover to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who in May accused the CIA of lying to her in 2002 about its use of waterboarding.

No way!


3 posted on 07/10/2009 11:25:58 AM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

And we’re supposed to believe a Democrat from Illinois ?


4 posted on 07/10/2009 11:27:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Since when is a democratic going to investigate anythng unless it is strictly for his/her benefit. More crap from the left.


5 posted on 07/10/2009 11:27:59 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I don't believe anyone in DC. R or D.
6 posted on 07/10/2009 11:31:16 AM PDT by BGHater (Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Wow, I thought Omoslem was bankrupting the USA with failed Marxist policies leading towards record unemployment and wealth destruction.

After hearing about this CIA story, I guess Omoslem isn’t doing those things after all.


7 posted on 07/10/2009 11:31:17 AM PDT by Islam=Murder (The United States - surrendering to Sharia without a peep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The enemy within paying back their pals in the “world community,” in line with Soetoro’s Chamberlain-esque appeasement policy.

And why should “Congress” know of all CIA covert ops? That was a boo-boo, to write that into law.


8 posted on 07/10/2009 11:31:55 AM PDT by La Enchiladita (I am not a spinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Schakowsky (D-IL) said Friday that the CIA and Bush administration consciously decided not to tell Congress.

Thank God for George W. Bush. How stupid would he have to have been to tell the America-hating rats anything important about secret CIA operations? There's a reason Patrick Leahy is known as "Leaky" Leahy.

Meanwhile, the program is ended. Anybody feel safer now?

9 posted on 07/10/2009 11:32:24 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Leaky Leahy will ‘out’ it shortly.


10 posted on 07/10/2009 11:33:08 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
[. . .official said the program was “on-again/off-again” and that it was never fully operational. . .]

Nathan Bedford Forrest pointed out on another thread this “program” may not have been anything but a plan.

11 posted on 07/10/2009 11:36:01 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Our enemies must be laughing their a$$es off right about now.


12 posted on 07/10/2009 11:36:42 AM PDT by Dallas59 ("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I wonder if they are talking about the Carnivore thing, or is that not really a secret?

parsy, who is curious


13 posted on 07/10/2009 11:37:14 AM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Congratulations, America, on your "historic" election.


14 posted on 07/10/2009 11:37:55 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
CIA Director Leon Panetta has terminated a "very serious" covert program...

And promptly initiated a "laughable" covert program, so as not to offend our "sensitive" opponents.

15 posted on 07/10/2009 11:38:39 AM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"... the National Security Act, which requires, with rare exceptions, that Congress be informed of covert activities. "

Our US Congress is currently a narional disaster. We need to be gearing up for 2010 primaries ...

I hope that's what Sarah Palin plans to do.

16 posted on 07/10/2009 11:40:07 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

“There was an impatience and a contempt for Congress”
And as my Aussie friends “and rightly so”


17 posted on 07/10/2009 11:40:41 AM PDT by wordsofearnest (Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

As it always is with democrats, party before country.


18 posted on 07/10/2009 11:42:06 AM PDT by newnhdad (The longest of journeys begins with one step.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wordsofearnest; All

Any response I could make was stated much more eloquently here:

(just substitute “CIA” for “Marines”)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo


19 posted on 07/10/2009 11:43:11 AM PDT by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Sounds like it was Congress they were investigating!


20 posted on 07/10/2009 11:44:24 AM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"there was...a contempt for the Congress"

Yeah, so?

Don't these people read their mail? Contempt is pretty widespread...

21 posted on 07/10/2009 11:48:51 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Panetta found out why there were no follow-ups to 9/11, and is making sure that program is dismantled.


22 posted on 07/10/2009 11:54:13 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Many times I felt it was an annoyance to them to have to come to us and answer our questions,” she said. “There was an impatience and a contempt for the Congress.”

Well deserved contempt!!


23 posted on 07/10/2009 11:58:14 AM PDT by jesseam (Been there and done that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
This is very, very serous.


24 posted on 07/10/2009 11:59:24 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Looks like some in Congre$$ are ‘spooked’ over being potential targets themselves.. I’d trust the CIA before I’d trust the State Dept.. but I’d prefer the Secret Service if I want the straight skinny..


25 posted on 07/10/2009 12:01:15 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
This is serious. Very, very serious.


26 posted on 07/10/2009 12:10:29 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (ABC-AP-MSNBC-All Obama, All the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
The problem for us Americans in going to be finding a way to keep our congress persons from telling it to the news papers. They find it impossible to keep a secret. How in hell can we have an effective CIA when congress is in the loop? Poor Leon will be dog meat.
27 posted on 07/10/2009 12:28:09 PM PDT by ANGGAPO (Leyte Gulf Beach Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

You know I hope we never have to find out how many terrorists were encouraged by Democrat Incompetence during the Bush years and now. You may not like the military or CIA but one day when libs are getting beheaded and crying “Daddy save us”...They are going to need ever Dirty Trick in the CIA’s arsenal...


28 posted on 07/10/2009 12:37:19 PM PDT by jakerobins ( NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jesseam
Many times I felt it was an annoyance to them to have to come to us and answer our questions,” she said.

Not unlike the feeling that constituents get when they speak to their member of the Imperial Congress.

29 posted on 07/10/2009 12:59:17 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

Time for a change! 2010 is the next available opportunity


30 posted on 07/10/2009 1:38:15 PM PDT by jesseam (Been there and done that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jesseam
Time for a change! 2010 is the next available opportunity

Here in the 2nd District of Kansas, Lynn Jenkins is okay, although I'd replace her in a heartbeat with our old Congressman, Jim Ryun. Hopefully, Sam Brownback will become Governor and either Rep. Todd Tiahrt or Rep. Jerry Moran will succeed Brownback and a good person will succeed whoever runs for the Senate seat.

I think 2010 will be a good year in Kansas. I live in a liberal part of the state and I'm already hearing people say they are sorry they voted for Obama.

31 posted on 07/10/2009 2:58:15 PM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I demand that we dissolve the CIA immediately. Oh, wait, then we would really be susceptible to terrorist attacks.


32 posted on 07/10/2009 3:26:04 PM PDT by REPANDPROUDOFIT (no more "till death do us part" public workers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
I wonder if they are talking about the Carnivore thing, or is that not really a secret?,/i>

Whatever happened to Carnivore, anyway?

33 posted on 07/10/2009 3:32:13 PM PDT by cookcounty (He who controls the Language controls the Debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
"Sounds like it was Congress they were investigating! "

My thought exactly!

34 posted on 07/10/2009 4:17:06 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

Oh, wait, then we would really be susceptible to terrorist attacks.


What attacks? We’re on their side now.


35 posted on 07/10/2009 5:25:08 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson