Posted on 07/01/2009 5:29:40 PM PDT by SkyPilot
Actually, rich or poor, some folks are just like that. That's the case of the Jackson's IMHO. Especially the father. His son has JUST died and he uses the TV coverage to announce he's launched a new record label.... anal orifice just doesn't quite do HIM the justice he deserves....
I wonder why not? (Duh!)
The second autopsy found the cause of death – a 10 year old weenie stuck in his butt.
Here are my top 5 MJ jokes:
Elton John will perform at Michael Jackson’s funeral. Just as he did with Princes Diana, Elton will rework one of his songs in MJ’s honor, "Don't let your son go down on me"
MJ gave instructions that he did want to be buried or cremated. He wanted to be recycled into
1. shopping bags, so he will forever be white, plastic, and dangerous for little boys to play with.
2. Legos, so little boys will always play with him.
MJ collapses at home, and the housekeeper screams - "Where should I take you?" With his dying breath he whispers, "Children's Hospital!"
What caused his cardiac arrest? He saw an ad from JC Penney’s that they had little boy’s underwear, half off.
Q. How did you know it was bedtime at MJ's house?
A. When the big hand was on the little hand.
I’ll bet that guy is puckered up tighter than a clam’s arse.
Apparently they were stunned because they believed the first autopsy was a load of crap.
As reflected in Jacko’s mutations.
FWIW, I agree.
......I forsee a big fight over rights......
My gut feeling from older reports is that these rights are pledged to creditors and the family will be stunned more than they over the autopsy.
I agree. My guess is Neverland will be turned into Graceland West.
A lawyer’s dream.
What? You mean the fact that he was a disgusting Pedophile, drug addicted bag of scum, somehow makes him a victim of himself and therefore excuses him from all forms of condemnation?
I highly doubt that his eternal place will justify it that way. Even Adolph Hitler had “Great artistic genius” which does nothing to cancel out the great wrong he committed in his life.
“somehow makes him a victim of himself and therefore excuses him from all forms of condemnation?”
I did NOT say anything about excusing him for anything.
I said he will be remembered as a great artist and as a flawed and tragic character.
Great artist? Yes. Flawed and tragic character? A lot more than just that. How 'bout a perverted pedophile that, unfortunately, was responsible for screwing up more lives than just his own. I can't over look any of that no matter how great a record Thriller was. Those kids will carry that sh!t will them always while he's...well, he's dead. Good riddance.
You seem unable to read.
I have repeatedly said that his character flaws WILL NOT be overlooked by history.
To admit that neither will his artistic genius be overlooked is not an excuse of his flaws.
And you seem unable to comprehend. If you could you would have known that my point was this: his disgusting behavior with little boys was a helluva lot more than simply "character flaws". OK? Get it? Jeeeez.
As for "artistic genius" he made one great album and a number of good ones, all during one decade. So, if he was a genius, he was not a long-term one.
You DON’T read.
I have not once said I disagreed with your sentiments about his flaws. I have repeatedly said he will be remembered for them.
However, it is also true that he will be remembered as a great artist.
I acknowledge all his flaws as you do.
But you seem to think his artistic talent will not and should not be recognized, because of his character flaws.
On a moral level one could say it should not, but on a practical level it simply will be; simply because he was, musically, very talented.
You seem only able to address how BAD” that fact is - that he will be remembered for his talent, even as he is remembered for his flaws.
I am not making a statement against your moral sentiments, but simply noting what will happen regardless of our moral sentiments.
You might feel that is morally unfair, morally not right.
But it simply is what happens when the world’s people remember such persons - they remember the personal flaws and the talent. That’s the way it is.
This is from a London tabloid that used the majority of its issues to create the “Whacko Jacko” image. Why would you believe a word they print and why would you drag it into a political forum?
I am sorry. Whatever you wish.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.