Posted on 06/30/2009 10:46:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The identity of the biological father of Michael Jackson’s children is being reported as that of his dermatologist, Arnold Klein.
Klein reportedly fathered the children with Jackson’s ex-wife Debbie Rowe, who gave birth to Prince Michael and Paris Michael Katherine. The identity of the mother or father to Prince Michael II, known as ‘Blanket’, is unknown.
Sources revealed Klein as the father to usmagazine.com, saying that "He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth."
Los Angeles-based Klein is Rowe’s former boss. She previously worked as a nurse’s assistant.
Rowe has reportedly reached out to the Jackson family in the wake of his death last Thursday (June 25). The three children are currently in the care of Jackson’s mother, Katherine, at her home in the San Fernando Valley, CA.
Just commented to my wife this morning that a paternity test should be done to determine who the real father is.
See also here :
David Crosby?
Curiouser and Curiouser :
See here :
http://www.nj.com/entertainment/celebrities/index.ssf/2009/06/reports_michael_jacksons_derma.html
Reports: Michael Jackson’s dermatologist fathered his kids; Debbie Rowe was not the biological mom
Well that explains why they look exactly like Macaulay Culkin.
SOURCE :
It seems like all the skeletons in Michael Jackson’s closet are slowly making their way out and into the limelight.
Earlier this morning we reported that Michael wasn’t the biological father or the sperm donor for any of his kids, and Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she had for Michael. She was simply used as the surrogate, and paid to carry the children to term.
Now we’re learning through Us Weekly that the biological father of Michael’s children is Arnold Klein, Jackson’s L.A.-based dermatologist and Rowe’s former boss.
“He is the dad,” says a Jackson insider. “He and Debbie signed an agreement saying they would never reveal the truth.”
Debbie admitted a few years ago that she carried his children as a “favor” to Michael, but would not confirm that the marriage was ever consummated.
According to TMZ, Michael never officially adopted his three children and although he is presumed the father, it’s not conclusive by any means.
Michael’s mother Katherine has already been granted temporary guardianship of his children, but their fate still lies in the hands of the judge. We hope this dermatologist doesn’t come out of the woodwork and try and fight for custody now that Michael has passed.
http://news.lalate.com/2009/06/30/debbie-rowe-not-the-mother/
TITLE : DEBBIE ROWE NOT THE MOTHER
Debbie Rowe is NOT the biological mother of Michael Jackson’s kids? Debbie Rowe is not their biological mother, just a surrogate mother, says a new report Tuesday.
On Sunday, Rowe in an exclusive interview revealed Michael Jackson is not the biological father of the two couple born during their marriage - Prince I and Paris. She said she simply gave a womb.
Rowe’s interview did not clarify if she was simply a surrogate or also the biological mother. Now moments ago a new report claims neither Jackson nor Rowe are the biological parents of Prince I and Paris.
The same report says all signs of the legal fence are arguing if she is the presumed biological mother or not since the children were born during the couple’s marriage. Rowe has not yet commented if she wants custody of the two children.
A hearing on Monday in Los Angeles superior court ruled that Katherine Jackson, Michael’s mother, can have temporary guardianship of the children, but not their estate.
LOLOL
good one
that's certainly a gene pool that will test the effects of long term drug usage
How are Melissa's little ones doing these days?
Hmmmm.
Reminds me of the lyrics behind MJ’s hit song — BILLIE JEAN.
CHORUS :
Billie jean is not my lover
Shes just a girl who claims that I am the one
But the kid
is not my son
She says I am the one, but the kid
is not my son
Is there nothing normal or real in the Jackson Neverland?
Exactly.
If Dr. Klein signed an agreement that he will never reveal the truth, then why did he reveal it?
I’m thinking the mother of all custody battles is about to begin.
I agree, SoldierDad. A paternity test is needed. This whole thing is typical MJ craziness.
Jackson’s dermatologist appears to have had some skin in this game.
I watched last night the interview Martin Bahir did with MJ in 2003..I thought it was very sad, MJ spoke about how he always saw himself as ugly and disgusting: compliments of
Daddy Dearest, who would tell him he had a big nose, he didn’t inherit the great looks of Joe Jackson’s side of the family. He spoke of when he was going through puberty, still with the Jackson 5 and he had acne, and while they were all at the Airport in Virginia, one lADY said where is *Little Michael* and when she saw him, she said YUK! that’s you? how hurt he was.....
No doubt this Superstar severly abused by his Father and going through Child Trauma as a overly sensitive kid caused his problems in Adulthood...So it is not suprising he is not the biological parents of those kids, because he loathed himself and saw himself as Ugly and un-worthy of true love....How can ou feel love, when you are born to a Man who makes you feel like he hates you and loathes you...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.