[GOP Poet]

Thanks for the post.

[ClearCase_guy]

research shows change is possible for gays

One of the major "gene" arguments is that it isn't a choice -- it couldn't be a choice! -- because no one would choose to live such a difficult, troublesome life as target of so much societal hatred!

Well, if change is possible, then I guess they will all line up and seek the cure, right? No? Ohhhh. Well, maybe the perverted lifestyle that they live is exactly the lifestyle that they want. I guess they chose it out of some mental illness.

I can pity the mentally ill, but I don't have to treat them like normal people.

[Julia H.]

*Sirens*

Hate speech! Hate speech! Hang the witches!

[bdeaner]

Here is a common t-shirt worn by pro-gays:



What's interesting about this t-shirt is that it HAS TO BE disingenuous. It claims homosexuality is a disease, like cancer. But if that were true, why don't they seek treatment for it? Wouldn't it be considered negligent NOT to receive treatment for a disease? If it's not a disease, then it's a choice. But they deny it's a choice. Can't have it both ways.

[sageb1]

The APA report came out over a month ago. Still waiting to see it in the MSM.

[Daniel II]

I believe in something I have termed the “Erotic Imprint.”

Somewhere along the line, we are imprinted with what we find sexually erotic.

Growing up in a loving family with a loving father and mother, we will see them interact and we will see the joys of a normal heterosexual relationship.

If one is, say, molested at an early age, or one has a sexual experience with the same sex, we will get a different erotic imprint.

Pornography can vastly influence this imprint as we permanently scar our memories with these images.

Once “imprinted,” it can take a lifetime to undo the damage, especially if it's not a healthy imprint.