Posted on 06/23/2009 5:40:12 AM PDT by fiodora
I'm wondering how long it will be before the word "impeachment" starts being bantered about?
The list of reasons to expel Obama keeps getting longer and stronger, and this is only five months into his reign.
Everyone knows about his inexperience. His rhetorical abilities made people overlook this weakness. Even his eligibility to have become president is becoming an issue.
He places personal and party ideologies over what is best for America. I thought when appointing justices, it was supposed to be "the best person for the job" and "justice is blind." Affirmative-action policies and "empathy" aren't part of the requirements for appointment.
He fits the definition of being a narcissist perfectly. This makes him extremely dangerous for the country. He only cares about what is best for him, not the country.
He is ashamed of our country (as was his wife until Barack won his party's nomination) even though it has given him immense amounts of opportunity. He constantly feels the need to apologize for our country's history of perceived repressiveness.
Sorry, Barack, we are the greatest country in the history of the world. No country has done more for other countries where there has been suppression of human rights, and Americans are unmatched in raising money and supplies for others when natural disasters hit.
You have been hanging around the Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers too long.
You have been going around (the Muslim world in particular), speaking of "the promise of a secular nation." How much more arrogant and ignorant can you be?
Even though you think highly of your rhetorical skills, you are not going to change the fact that a vast majority of Americans believe in God.
Why do you keep implying to other countries that our country was not founded on Judeo-Christian principles?
Your history of duplicity is unmatched. This was illustrated numerous times throughout the campaign. You carry it forward into your presidency.
You incur the largest-ever budget deficit and then insist that we operate on a pay-as-you-go principle from now on. Of course, shortly thereafter, you exempt your government-run health program costs from this rule. You are great with smoke and mirrors, Barack. You are the ultimate flim-flam man.
You are a corrupt man. You appoint tax cheats and disreputable people to positions of power. You promise no lobbyists in your administration, yet no other administration had close to the number you now have.
You fire people who uncover very serious issues of impropriety by organizations run by individuals who are close friends of yours. You had your Justice Department cancel a criminal suit against goons, representing your friends ACORN and the Black Panthers, involving voter intimidation tactics at election polls.
You are dishonest and lie when it serves your purposes. Including examples above, you ridiculed John McCain's idea of taxing employer-funded health insurance premiums, promising never to follow such a policy during your administration.
Change your mind, Obama? You promised no tax increases for individuals making under $250,000. What do you call proposals like getting rid of tax-excludable programs like Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts?
Millions of middle- and low-income individuals participate in these programs. What do you call new taxes proposed on soda and beer? I guess only the rich drink these.
You are proposing one of the largest increases in corporate taxes in history. Who do you think ends up paying for these increased costs of doing business?
I think these mentioned items also fall under the topic of incompetence. And I thought we could never get a leader less competent than Jimmy Carter. I was wrong.
How about your lying to the American Medical Association? You specifically said, "I'll be honest, there are countries where a single-payer system works pretty well."
Why couldn't your press secretary name just one when pressed for an example?
Why did your mainstream media stooges, especially The Washington Post, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, specifically leave that quote out of their news articles, but quote everything said before and after that part of your speech perfectly?
You continually show disrespect for and trample on our Constitution, especially when it bars you from enacting your most radical ideas.
There is hope, however. Sixty-six percent of the voters from age 18 to 30 voted for you while only 32 percent voted for McCain. Voters 30 and above, on the other hand, favored you by a margin of only 50 percent to 49 percent.
Do you think you can fool the younger voting bloc twice, Barack? I don't think so, especially when they see the impact of your socialist agenda on their lives. Maybe we won't have to wait another 31/2 years for "change."
A long time. The impeachment won’t happen. In fact, he will be re-elected in 2012 by bigger majority than he was in 2008. What he probably be is the last person to occupy the WhiteHouse.
His rhetorical teleprompter reading abilities made people overlook this weakness.
We do not impeach Presidents who are of the Democrat persuasion in this country.
Period
Saw my first Impeach Obama bumper sticker ...yesterday.
Or at least the last person elected to that position.
Republicans, Libertarians and Independents better do some real soul searching and not put another geriatric out of touch candidate in place to run against him.
Still, he may very likely get reelected as most Americans are idiots who understand the dynamics of American Idol better than presidential elections.
In fact, the problems caused by Congress are MUCH greater than those caused by the man who calls himself "Barack Obama". The system needs a reboot, and I think that's what will happen.
But things need to get a lot worse. Fortunately, the Congress can't stop itself, so things getting worse is a given.
A person who can not qualify for the presidency is merely a fraud. Frauds are criminally prosecuted. It is impossible to impeach someone who can't be president.
Where's the Birth Certificate?
I disagree.
Elections will resume after the reboot, probably within a few years.
Stop focussing on "Obama". Congress is the problem. Restricting the franchise is the solution.
Ça ira.
We do not impeach Presidents who are of the Democrat persuasion in this country.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Clinton was impeached. The Senate refused to convict him.
Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson were both Democrats.
“The impeachment won’t happen. In fact, he will be re-elected in 2012 by bigger majority than he was in 2008.”
########
This is why the 2010 elections are so important. If we can get new bodies in that see through this crapt, they can start the impeachment process then...or if the process gets blocked, then they can certainly diminish the speed at which these bills are getting passed.
Where's the body with the authority to demand it? (Hint: they're up on Capitol Hill, pretending to be Senators and Members of Congress).
Ain’t gonna happen... The Senate has to convict to remove and they all know what an absolute idiot Biden is.
From Oneonta, NY. I like it. But I don’t think Impeachment is in the cards. Too many demos in there and 2010 won’t change the balance enough, if at all. I would like to see him politically neutered though.
Saw my first Impeach Obama bumper sticker ...yesterday
##########
I’ve been looking all over for one of those. Anyone know who’s selling them?
In my haste, I was thinking removal by the Senate.
That will not happen.
Sorry
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.