It could be.
The problem is that they've painted themselves into a corner. Science has no plausible explanation for abiogenesis as of yet, and the faith that they exhibit in the confidence that some day science WILL be able to explain it, sans external meddling, is impressive.
[[The problem is that they’ve painted themselves into a corner. Science has no plausible explanation for abiogenesis as of yet,]]
Worse than that- working from the present on backerds- they have no explanation for macroevolution either- everythign discovered in science is nothign but microevolutionary evidence, and nothign to date proves that microevolution can create new non species specific organs and features needed for macroevolution- they haven’t even been able to jump this biologically impossible hurdle yet, and they’re tryign to show that amino acids can form under carefully controlled and manipulated circumstances in the lab? Where’s all the informaiton and metainformation coming from to keep ‘species’ fit once they do manage to create single cells out of chemicals? Where is the needed metainformaiton goiong to come from to move a psecies beyond it’s own kind? Random mutaitons sure aren’t capable of providing that kind of mega-informaiton, thta’s for sure.