Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/14/2009 6:04:44 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Steelfish

Give Sikhs a pass. Just my opinion.


2 posted on 06/14/2009 6:06:00 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
"I'm an American, ...

Then act like one - shave the beard ...

3 posted on 06/14/2009 6:07:14 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

The problem is a very slippery slope.


5 posted on 06/14/2009 6:08:31 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) We know how to deal with Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Really appreciate your patriotism, now remove the Sikhs so we can give you a buzz cut and issue you a nice helmet.


6 posted on 06/14/2009 6:09:51 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
That's Sikh!!
8 posted on 06/14/2009 6:11:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("The unarmed man is not just defenseless - he is also contemptible." Machiavelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Conform to military standards or get out!


9 posted on 06/14/2009 6:11:39 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

the RCMP had the same issue in 1994 - They caved.


10 posted on 06/14/2009 6:11:49 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

When I was in the Army we had Sikhs. They wore their sword as a photograph. The underwear we didn’t care about. The olive drab turban fit nicely under their helmets. Beards were trimmed so that gas masks fit.


13 posted on 06/14/2009 6:12:43 PM PDT by donmeaker (Invicto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

A beard is less disruptive than open, practicing homosexuals in uniform.

Since the latter is already supposed to be coming down, I can’t see a problem with giving into the Sikhs on this one.


15 posted on 06/14/2009 6:15:01 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

It must have been a terrible shock to him when he found out he wouldn’t be the first soldier to be allowed to have a beard.


17 posted on 06/14/2009 6:17:07 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
By virtue of Admiral Zumwalt's directives, I was allowed to have a beard the last two years I was in the Navy. When I was in combat, we shaved irregularly, including the officers. I don't see facial hair as an impediment to military discipline.

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
20 posted on 06/14/2009 6:18:54 PM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
There's some reasonable precedent for this -- not legally binding in the USA of course -- of the Gurkha regiments in the imperial era British Army.

They have a hell of a reputation as good soldiers in every way.

21 posted on 06/14/2009 6:19:25 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Steel turbans?


29 posted on 06/14/2009 6:41:50 PM PDT by SkyDancer ('Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not..' ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

My dad has pictures of two Sikhs he served with in the 70’S and both are wearing turbans. Doesn’t seem to have been a problem then.


30 posted on 06/14/2009 6:44:03 PM PDT by TWfromTEXAS (Life is the one choice that pro choicers wonÂ’t support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Ditto to all who said it, give Sikhs a pass.

“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds”

In cases like this, a well regulated military can make small concessions for a greater good.

These guys are good to have, and they are no danger to good order and discipline.


32 posted on 06/14/2009 6:47:19 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Sikhs are generally very good soldiers. The only half credible excuse for kicking them out over non-sealing protective masks is nonsense, as a large percentage of black male soldiers have facial skin that will not seal masks either, because of Pseudofolliculitis Barbae (PFB).

Uniformity in the military is NOT so that militarists can get all excited about having an army of clones. It is solely for logistics and supply, neither of which are impacted by Sikh religious obligations.

However, Sikhs are in many cases far *better* soldiers than the ordinary good soldier. They are orderly, disciplined, professional, and responsible. This is why they tend to dominate the Indian army as a whole, and the Indian Sikh regiment is one of their most highly decorated units.

“The Battle of Saragarhi is considered one of the greatest stories of collective bravery in human history. The contingent of twenty-one soldiers from the 36th Sikhs was led by Havildar Ishar Singh, and held off an Afghan attack of 10,000 men for several hours.

“All 21 Sikh soldiers chose to fight to the death instead of surrendering. In recognition of their supreme sacrifice, the British Parliament rose to pay them respect, and each one of them was awarded the Indian Order of Merit (equivalent to the Victoria Cross).

“The battle has been compared to the Battle of Thermopylae, where a small Greek force faced a large Persian army of Xerxes (480 BC).”


36 posted on 06/14/2009 6:59:28 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Boot camp is where all the bad habits are driven out of you and you become part of a team relying on the man next to you.

To get to this type of comraderie, all of the recruits have to look the same, sound the same, march the same, talk, eat, sleep, crap and generally get robotized before they can rely on each other.

If the Sikhs want to go through that and AFTER getting assigned grow their beards back, and wear their tubans, I see no problem with it. Sikhs are fanatic friends and fearsome fighters. Any of the services should welcome them.

42 posted on 06/14/2009 7:09:40 PM PDT by Pistolshot (The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Seems to me this might be a case of the US pays for my medical school, and then I don’t have to fullfill my part.
They had to know before that turbans weren’t part of the uniform.


44 posted on 06/14/2009 7:26:20 PM PDT by Tessarie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

If he don’t like the way we do things in America he can go back to where he came from. We want miss him.


45 posted on 06/14/2009 7:30:50 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I have met and worked with many Sikhs (including ex Military types) and I respect them enormously.

I believe this insistence on “rules” is ridiculous. These rules are not sacred like our constitution. These rules in many cases were CHANGED tens of times since our country began and can be changed again. Heck, our Constitution, which next to the Bible is the holiest document to me, allows itself to be changed.

We allowed beards once and we can allow it again. Rules should NOT be ignored. No Sir. However, rules can and should be changed when they make sense.

We allowed blacks in the Army. Using the idiotic logic on display in this thread, if FR had existed back in the 40s I am sure someone would have posted “Rules are rules”

Keep context in mind guys. Some random Sikh guy wants to join our United States army and DIE FOR ME!!!!

Did you get that?? He wants the privelege of dying for me, my family, my consitution and my country (and Texas, my most beloved state).

This Sikh guy also likes to wear a beard as his religion asks for it.

So the way I see it, we allowed beards once. Our greatest generals wore beards. We can freaking allow them again for what is arguably one of the greatest martial races in the world.

Go Sikhs! Go US Armed Forces! Go Texas!


50 posted on 06/14/2009 8:09:11 PM PDT by SoftwareEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson