Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant

Having checked the wikipedia entry on her ouster, it sounds like the production company which held her contract as Miss California arranged things so that she’d be in breach of contract. Reading between the lines, it seems that the production company attempted to push her into appearances which have not traditionally been part of the Miss California franchise (Playboy and a reality TV show), and when she refused they terminated her contract.

It would be interesting if they make the same demands of her successor.


15 posted on 06/11/2009 5:15:07 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000
Reading between the lines, it seems that the production company attempted to push her into appearances which have not traditionally been part of the Miss California franchise (Playboy and a reality TV show), and when she refused they terminated her contract.

A simple comparison of the history of required appearances, plus noting any "extras" they tacked on after her Miss USA competition, should be enough for a successful suit.

Selecting the jury would take about ten years, though (there ain't much middle ground).

24 posted on 06/11/2009 5:36:14 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson