To: hoosiermama; Red Steel; null and void; LucyT; BP2; Amityschild; Calpernia; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ...
2 posted on
06/09/2009 11:06:15 AM PDT by
rxsid
To: rxsid
I would almost guarantee that this judge is setting up the ruling that since the ‘elected’ inidividual has been sworn in by the subpreme Roberts court, the case against him as qualified is moot.
3 posted on
06/09/2009 11:28:31 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: rxsid
11 posted on
06/09/2009 1:46:38 PM PDT by
Freedom2specul8
(Please pray for our troops.... http://www.americasupportsyou.mil/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson