Posted on 06/09/2009 4:26:12 AM PDT by Kaslin
The Conservative women dont have the ACLU to defend them.
Good-bye old friend. You are no longer needed.
I expect the National Association for (of? don’t know) Women will be expressing their outrage any minute.
PB was attacking GOP women, that's OK. Sadly they will get a pass by all women's lobbyist groups.
Did the article really say “hate rape” (redundant)?
I thoug it was “hate fxxx”?
Not rationalizing, but when you use quotes, it means you’re actually quoting something.
IF a conservative authored such an article they’d be charged with “incitement to commit felony rape”.
Bigger picture here -
leftists, historically, “punish” their political opponents, often through the use of government force, but also through the use of government “sanction” of crimes committed against “conservatives” (whatever they were labeled in the contemporary setting).
Note the case of the voter intimidation thugs getting their default sentences revoked.
Next time, it will be a physical assault, and the gov’t, if still in leftist hands, will sanction that assault by not punishing the perps.
Funny, while you were posting me, I was post this on a thread on that subject:
Imagine if someone had taken down the clown with the nightstick in front of the polling place....
Remember that leftists only believe in diversity of (liberal) comment and action. Conservative comment and action need not apply.
fighting back will be punished severely - hate crime, don’t ya know - racism.
I didn’t read the article, but I’ve heard it as hate sex rather than hate rape. There is a difference. It’s not a great idea to detach love from sex, but one can be sexually attracted to people you otherwise detest. I think that’s what they were getting at: “We hate everything about these women beside their bodies.”
Would have been better for Playboy to call them “Conservatives We’d Love to F***,” or simply, “Hot Republicans.”
Conservative women don’t NEED the ACLU — or anybody else — to “defend” them. As anyone who’s seen Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, or a host of other gutsy conservative ladies knows, they’re perfectly capable of defending themselves.
Want to see true liberation? Come to the Right side.
“Conservative women don’t NEED the ACLU — or anybody else — to “defend” them. As anyone who’s seen Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, or a host of other gutsy conservative ladies knows, they’re perfectly capable of defending themselves.”
Yeah....
That and they’re all heavily armed....
I’m of the opinion that Coulter or Palin would take down a would-be attacker from at least parking lot distance....
RLTW
Your explanation is sensible, but I personally find the expression "hate rape" pleonastic. After all, the expression "hate rape" implies that its opposite would be a "love rape." Are they claiming that "ordinary rape" is an act of love?
Regards,
Not to mention they are hell-bent on aborting a bunch of us, too, considering that statistically, female babies outnumber the males.
The original article said hate-(f-word)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.