Posted on 06/07/2009 4:13:34 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
This much is true, it is a smokescreen. Because where he was born isn’t all that relevant, his IMMIGRATION STATUS is whats relevant that that is the question Obama doesn’t want answered.
If he was born in Hawaii then he doesn't have an immigration status, does he?
Yeah it does.
Hawaii does count I know, I was born there and am a Natural Born citizen. BUT, that being said, Hawaii has a vested interest in keeping quiet just how loosely things were tracked back in the 60’s. That baby could have easily been born in Africa, and then “registered” as a home birth which would list a street address NOT a hospital and doctor , and they would have accepted that along with a witness signature which I am willing to bet Ann’s Dunham’s mother provided. It doesn’t matter who provided it. The point is, it would have been easy to get Obama registered in Hawaii as having been born there even if he WAS NOT.
VERY easy, and Hawaii does not want the massive headache that that information would cause jumping down its throat. So they are hiding it.
Hawaiian government in the 60-70’s was and for all I know still is massively corrupt.
So McCain is not a natural born citizen?
Sure he does, if he was adopted by Lolo them he lost his citizenship to become a citizen of Indonesia to go to school there. He could have EASILY gotten that back on returning to the US, but NOT as a Natural Born citizen. You can’t get that status back, and neither Indonesia nor the US recognize dual citizenship between those two countries.
Game over, Obama lost his Natural Born Status when he became a citizen of Indonesia.
No he didn't. If he was born in Hawaii then he's a natural born citizen and nobody except Obama himself can relinquish that. Parents cannot do it on behalf of a minor child. And he could only give it up as an adult by deliberately performing one of the legally defined expatriating acts.
Game over, Obama lost his Natural Born Status when he became a citizen of Indonesia.
He didn't lose it. Game back on.
I agree — I’m sure you are correct.
As it turns out, for Texas anyway, a STATE-issued birth certificate created before 1964 is not acceptable for the purposes of a issuing a passport.
When I asked later, the clerk told me that the COUNTY-issued birth certificates DOES have the necessary information the U.S. State Department seems to be looking for to issue a passport chiefly a certifying authority who is an independent witness of the birth, as well as the hospital or location of birth. The STATE-issued birth certificate, issued before 1964, does not seem to have this information, and is not accepted by the State Dept to issue a passport.
I suspect that because of the scanning and printing technology that exists, a person could get a copy of an older Texas birth certificate and place their information on it. If the counterfeiter was born in another country (say like just across the border in Mexico), they could attest that their parents gave birth to them at home in remote west Texas. If both parents are dead, and there was no midwife, there is no confirmation possible.
If you look at Obamas famed birth certificate on the internet, it too lacks the birth witness information (ie, attending physician/midwife and address of birth).
As we've had no independent confirmation from the two hospitals Obama has claimed he may have been born, it understandable why questions linger:
FDR was born in Canada as well.
Okubo? Obama?
Where did Okubo come from
Correct.
This sort of puts the truth in the neighborhood of, OH Yeah? Whatever.
Then it's a good thing he didn't win.
The Constitution recognizes two forms of citizenship - natural born and naturalized. So far as it's concerned if you're not one then you're the other. The 14th Amendment says that children born in the states are, with few exceptions, citizens at birth, AKA natural born citizen. Simple as that.
Hawaii became a state in 1959 and in the law is considered “in the U. S mainland,” even though Hawaii Islanders use the word differently.
So Obama probably meets the requirement of being born “in the U. S. mainland,” but he does not meet the requirement of two U. S. citizen parents.
That he was born a Kenyan citizen and British subject only serves to underline the fact that he is not now, nor ever has been a “natural born citizen.”
Well, the Democrats couldn’t say anything if he did.
Nancy Pelosi and company passed a congressional resolution declaring him eligible.
It was a Senate resolution, and it was non-binding.
Where is that requirement laid out? Because if true the you've just elimintated Bobby Jindal, too.
How interesting....my best friend got a paper copy of her COB from Hawaii just a couple of years ago. It was mailed to her, not electronic as the article states
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.