Skip to comments.
Single women gaze longer
Springer Science + Business Media ^
| 3 June 2009
| Renate Bayaz
Posted on 06/03/2009 12:58:58 PM PDT by Pharmboy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Pharmboy
I thought it was Ohio cheerleaders who had to be kept from grazing. Oh, wait, you said gazing.
To: jessduntno
AMAZING WOMAN..........................
22
posted on
06/03/2009 1:09:51 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: Pharmboy
How many of them bit their lower lip while gazing at the photos? That’s the real indicator.
To: Pharmboy
"which possibly suppresses their attention to and appraisal of alternative partners." So what about that old chestnut? ...then eating 'wedding cake' suppresses women's attention to and appraisal to all partners.
To: Revolting cat!
Someone should post the pix of angry Michelle Obowma with the caption ‘Crazing Woman’ ...
25
posted on
06/03/2009 1:10:47 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Pharmboy
And in today’s other breaking stories, sun rises in east, and water freezes when it gets cold...film at ll!
26
posted on
06/03/2009 1:11:27 PM PDT
by
Clioman
To: Pharmboy
However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos.
Amazing!
and how much did this study cost taxpayers?
27
posted on
06/03/2009 1:12:43 PM PDT
by
Minutemen
("It's a Religion of Peace")
To: MHGinTN
CRAZING WOMAN
28
posted on
06/03/2009 1:13:17 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
(July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
To: MHGinTN
Crazing Woman!
To: Tijeras_Slim
30
posted on
06/03/2009 1:14:44 PM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Revolting cat!
31
posted on
06/03/2009 1:14:45 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
("Way past time for new commodities regulation")
To: HoosierHawk
Nice pick-up...we need Captain Unambiguous to edit this release.
32
posted on
06/03/2009 1:16:21 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: jessduntno
PHASING WOMAN
33
posted on
06/03/2009 1:18:36 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: jessduntno
Good ones...since you’re on fire, how about Blazing Woman?
34
posted on
06/03/2009 1:19:27 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Who ever thought we would long for the days of the Clinton administration...)
To: Pharmboy
Single women graze longer?
35
posted on
06/03/2009 1:20:49 PM PDT
by
DocH
(Official Right-Wing Extremist Veteran Seal Of Approval)
To: jessduntno
HAZING WOMEN
36
posted on
06/03/2009 1:20:53 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Pharmboy
A study by neuroscientist Heather Rupp and her team found that a woman's partner status influenced her interest in the opposite sex. In the study¹, published in the March issue of Human Nature, women both with and without sexual partners showed little difference in their subjective ratings of photos of men when considering such measures as masculinity and attractiveness. However, the women who did not have sexual partners spent more time evaluating photos of men, demonstrating a greater interest in the photos. No such difference was found between men who had sexual partners and those who did not. Federal funding for validation of common sense is not demonstrative of smart thinking.
37
posted on
06/03/2009 1:23:09 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Out of gas become a pill box, Out of ammo become a bunker, Out of hope become a hero.)
To: r9etb
Blazing woman...
38
posted on
06/03/2009 1:23:42 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 135 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: r9etb
TASING WOMAN:
39
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:26 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Pharmboy
40
posted on
06/03/2009 1:25:30 PM PDT
by
bdeaner
(The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
