It’s a shame we smokers brought down the WTC.
********************************
But of course smokers have - you saw this doosey-right?
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/125259.html
NO! Thanks. That’s brilliant. Smokers as “radical individualists”.
The Economist recently cited some “authorities” who consider a cigarette worse than smoking crack.
Hey, didja hear, even in NH now, you can marry a fag, you just can’t smoke one.
How come gays seem to get the biggest chuckle outta that one....
The brazen audacity of this Dan Beauchamp fellow is breathtaking, but seems to have really caught on among the nomenklatura.
This Health Uber Alles SEIG HEALTH philosophy is undermining and destroying three centuries of Western, British and American concepts of liberty, individual freedom (including to be left alone with like minded individuals) and jurisprudence based on the ideas of Locke, Burke, Bacon, Marlowe, Franklin, Paine and many others.
Seeing how so many “conservatives” subscribe to the Health Nazi Nannyists Jihad on Tabak, it will be fun to watch the squirming, wailing and teethgnashing as the tenets of Nannyism are applied to ALL aspects of human existence, since putting health on a pedestal means every aspect of an individual’s (how quaint a word in this era of collectivity for the alleged greater good) is now under the purview of the Boards of Health.
A while ago I joked that we are now not the US, but the United Boards of Health of America.
I have to stop joking around, this stuff is too real!
Health Jacobins is a good description of this crowd.
No wonder you keep that piece handy! Wow!