Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lormand
....she would be cleaning homes instead of burning the US Constitution.

Yes, the woman is a left-wing radical, but still a rather tasteless, and quite possibly racist remark.

Also rather pointless, as many "Republicans," voted for her for the federal bench, and fairly recently. Given the numbers Obama I has at his disposal, this is your next Supreme Court Justice. Deal wit it.

You will hear lots of "harrumphing" noises from your friendly RINO's about "legislating from the bench, yadda yadda yadda" but she'll appease them and get most of their votes.

Yet another reason why more "conservatives" should have held their noses and voted for McLame, although frankly, I probably wouldn't have like his picks all that much, either.

7 posted on 05/27/2009 8:38:31 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kenny Bunk
"Yes, the woman is a left-wing radical, but still a rather tasteless, and quite possibly racist remark"

"quite possibly racist"

Well even thinking it could be racist would make it racist right?

At first, I was going to say, "maybe she should be a giving drivers license exams at the DMV", but that would burden all of us. Then I thought, "maybe she should be some admissions director at a local community college", but that too would burden us.

Cleaning homes is what she could do and not have a harmful effect on the city, state, or nation she lives in.

Political Correctness has infected most of us here, but not me thankfully. Political Correctness is this nations version of Stalinism.

8 posted on 05/27/2009 8:48:05 AM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk
You shouldn't have posted my comment since the admin pulled the post.

Otherwise, nobody would have seen my "quite possibly racist" comment.

11 posted on 05/27/2009 9:03:52 AM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Kenny Bunk

“Yet another reason why more “conservatives” should have held their noses and voted for McLame, although frankly, I probably wouldn’t have like his picks all that much, either. “

This woman is to the Constitution what Kryponite was to Superman.

But you know the rel problem? Obama UP FRONT told he wanted judges with ‘empathy’ which is utter bullpukey. The law is the law, and if ‘law+empathy’ gives you a different decision from just a judge who goes by the law, then you have subtracted from the law, not added to it. That is the essense of judicial activism, using personal and policy preferences to dictate decisions.

We will get more dreadful, awful picks like this, and it wont matter if its this woman or a white male like Lawrence Tribe; Obama’s picks will be bad because Obama wants the judges with the worst inclinations and predispositions towards the law and Constitution.


18 posted on 05/27/2009 12:33:56 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson