Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Hmmmm, I know that the pro-life message has been resonating with the American public, but here’s an additional arsenal that can be used.

Since the left love to make abortion all about the woman and her health and her rights, and always ignores the baby, it’s been difficult to make headway while “debating” the abortion issue.

However, perhaps the rebuttal a pro-lifer can now say is “why do you want to hurt women? Why do you want to see women scarred for life? Do you have any sympathy at all for the emotional and psychological pain a woman goes through when she murders her child?”

Put the pro-abortion crowd on the defensive, for once!


11 posted on 05/25/2009 11:55:41 AM PDT by nomoremods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nomoremods
The answer of stopping abortion starts with changing the language from fetus to baby. A human face needs to be put on the child without a face to the world. Also, in terms of special needs children there needs to be an end to the idea that they are imperfect and there must be social acceptance of them on a grand scale. These are things that you cannot legislate and I think going the path of legislation is the wrong path. Having said that there should not be a federal law that explicitly states that the right is enshrined in the constitution
14 posted on 05/25/2009 12:28:07 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: nomoremods
The answer of stopping abortion starts with changing the language from fetus to baby. A human face needs to be put on the child without a face to the world. Also, in terms of special needs children there needs to be an end to the idea that they are imperfect and there must be social acceptance of them on a grand scale. These are things that you cannot legislate and I think going the path of legislation is the wrong path. Having said that there should not be a federal law that explicitly states that the right is enshrined in the constitution
15 posted on 05/25/2009 12:28:38 PM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: nomoremods

The primary focus has to be on the baby who is murdered.


23 posted on 05/26/2009 1:47:31 AM PDT by TheFourthMagi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: nomoremods

I once made the comment. The nut replied:

“It’s you pro-lifers and your nonsense that is harming women. You convince them that a worthless piece of tissue is a baby and then they get all guilty over it. If it weren’t for you and your lies, every single woman would be happy about her abortion. Besides statistics say that most women are already happy about their choice.”


25 posted on 05/26/2009 8:25:14 AM PDT by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson