Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard

But a contract is a civil matter; police enforcement is a criminal matter.


15 posted on 05/21/2009 3:35:18 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: clee1
Dress code contracts typically include language to the effect that those who do not abide by the dress code (conditions of the contract) will be required to depart the premises. Their failure to depart, when requested to do so, becomes trespassing ... and can quickly escalate to disorderly conduct or assault. These most certainly are criminal matters. The cop was "moonlighting" as a private security guard, thus was well within his authority to :
1) request that the guest abide by the terms of the contract that allowed him to be on the premises
2) arrest the guests who became disorderly rather than abiding by the contract.

This simply is NOT a matter of police or state overreaching. It's a matter of a young punk acting like a young punk, and two old idiots who should know better aiding and abetting him. The groom has no excuse whatsoever: he signed the contract, he knew its contents.

24 posted on 05/21/2009 3:42:51 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson